Garcia v. Garcia, 11457.

Decision Date29 November 1944
Docket NumberNo. 11457.,11457.
Citation185 S.W.2d 227
PartiesGARCIA v. GARCIA.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Smallwood & Gibbon, of Harlingen, for plaintiff in error.

John Q. Adams and Polk Hornaday, both of Harlingen, for defendant in error.

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a divorce case brought here by writ of error. Articles 2249 and 2249a, Vernon's Ann.Civ.Stats., Rules 359-363, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

The complaint of the sufficiency of the petition for divorce is not well taken, but the judgment must be reversed as the evidence is not "full and satisfactory" as required by Article 4632, Vernon's Ann.Civ. Stats.

As cause for divorce, defendant in error, Telesforo Garcia, relied upon the grounds set forth in Article 4629, § 1, Vernon's Ann.Civ.Stats.

Telesforo Garcia was the only witness who testified at the trial and the record of his testimony occupies three and a half pages of a Q and A statement of facts.

It appears that Telesforo Garcia married plaintiff in error, Atanacia Chamberlain de Garcia, in 1921. They separated in April, 1943. The parties have a son twenty-two years of age, now serving in the American Navy. They had separated several times prior to the 1943 separation.

As to the nature of his wife's conduct, Telesforo Garcia testified as follows:

"Q. What has been the nature of her conduct toward you for the last few years? A. She didn't live happily with me; she was always jealous and quarreling with me.

"Q. Did she have a jealous disposition? A. Very much so.

"Q. What kind of temper did she have? A. Very violent.

"Q. Did she quarrel at you? A. Yes, sir; all the time.

"Q. Did she abuse you? A. Yes, sir.

"Q. Did she make your home life unhappy? A. Yes, sir. * * *

"Q. What conclusion did you reach the last time you tried to live with her as to whether you would be able to make a success of your married life? A. No, sir; I couldn't live with her any more.

"Q. What effect did it have on your life and your work, the violent abuse and quarrels indulged in the last time? A. I went to her mother's home and she told me she didn't love me and didn't want to have anything more to do with me.

"Q. What effect did that statement have on you? A. It made me nervous and I came to the conclusion it would be impossible to live with her any longer. * * * "Court: Just what was this quarreling about? A. Sometimes I would come home early and other times I would come home late, and she was very jealous and always accused me of running around with other women, which was absolutely untrue, and she always argued with me about that."

Under the authorities the decree cannot stand. McCullough v. McCullough, 120 Tex. 209, 36 S.W.2d 459; Hyatt v. Hyatt, Tex.Civ.App., 111 S.W.2d 341; 15 Tex. Jur. 547, § 84.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded.

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellee has filed a motion for rehearing in which he says: "In addition to the evidence introduced before the Trial Court on the trial for divorce, the Trial Court had other circumstances that it could consider in giving weight to the testimony of the plaintiff and which the Trial Court no doubt considered as admissions on the part of the plaintiff of the truth of the allegations contained in the plaintiff's petition. The record shows that appellant was duly and legally cited by citation to appear and answer the appellee's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Bell v. Bell, 14530
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • April 1, 1965
    ...v. Allen, Tex.Civ.App., 267 S.W.2d 911; Cantwell v. Cantwell, Tex.Civ.App., 217 S.W.2d 450; Golden v. Golden, supra; Garcia v. Garcia, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W.2d 227. We have read the entire statement of facts and have concluded that the evidence in this case is insufficient as a matter of la......
  • Gentry v. Gentry
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 23, 1965
    ...267 S.W.2d 911; Cantwell v. Cantwell, Tex.Civ.App., 217 S.W.2d 450; Golden v. Golden, Tex.Civ.App., 238 S.W.2d 619; Garcia v. Garcia, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W.2d 227. For the reasons stated, the decree of the court below is reversed and judgment here rendered that appellee be denied a Reversed......
  • Boenker v. Boenker, 14838
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 23, 1966
    ...only where there is no evidence warranting a submission of issues to a jury. Rule 301 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.' In Carcia v. Garcia, 1944, 185 S.W.2d 227, the trial court without a jury rendered judgment for divorce in favor of the plaintiff. The San Antonio Court of Civil Appeals h......
  • Stevenson v. Stevenson
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • October 8, 1964
    ...267 S.W.2d 911; Cantwell v. Cantwell, Tex.Civ.App., 217 S.W.2d 450; Golden v. Golden, Tex.Civ.App., 238 S.W.2d 619; Garcia v. Garcia, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W.2d 227. Even if we assume that appellee is a highly sensitive person, there is no evidence in the record before us showing that the act......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT