Garcia v. State, 99-1231.

Decision Date09 June 1999
Docket NumberNo. 99-1231.,99-1231.
PartiesLincoln GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Lincoln Garcia, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Lincoln Garcia appeals an order denying his motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), requesting credit for additional jail time served. It appears that the motion requests additional credit for time served both before and after sentencing.

To the extent that the motion requests credit for time served after sentencing, the order denying relief is affirmed without prejudice to the defendant to raise that issue with the Department of Corrections. See Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984, 987, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D776, D778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Defendant-appellant Garcia must first exhaust his administrative remedies within the Department of Corrections prior to seeking judicial relief. See id.

With respect to defendant's request for credit for jail time served prior to sentencing, we reverse and remand for further consideration in light of this court's recent decision in Hidalgo. See id. at D777, 729 So.2d at 986. Under our standard of review of an order summarily denying a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or 3.850, "unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief, the order shall be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing." Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(i). As the record does not conclusively refute defendant's claim, the order is reversed with respect to the claim for credit for time served prior to sentencing, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Jefferson v. State, 4D02-2258.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 30, 2002
    ...is to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court. Smith v. State, 819 So.2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Because the amount of credit appellant should have received from his prior sentence is not apparent from the record, we affir......
  • Vasquez v. State, 3D02-1879.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 30, 2002
    ...action is required only as to claims to time served post-sentencing. Ramos v. State, 823 So.2d 265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The order is therefore reversed and remanded for an appropriate hearing on the appellant's motion at which he may prevai......
  • Smith v. State, 3D03-121.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 12, 2003
    ...379 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(concluding defendant must exhaust his administrative remedies prior to seeking judicial relief); Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(same); Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984, 987(Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(same). With respect to defendant's request for credit for ......
  • Ramos v. State, 3D02-937.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 7, 2002
    ...court relief. As the State agrees, however, this rule applies only to claims to time served after sentencing. See Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The cause is remanded for an appropriate hearing on the appellant's motio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT