Garcia v. State, 72--408

Decision Date14 November 1972
Docket NumberNo. 72--408,72--408
Citation268 So.2d 575
PartiesPablo Montes GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Donald F. Frost, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Pablo Montes Garcia, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of aggravated assault.

One of the grounds argued by appellant for reversal is that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a shirt worn by the victim and not listed on the state's bill of particulars nor made known to the defendant until it was offered into evidence.

Appellant had made a timely motion for a statement of particulars and for discovery but the shirt was not listed as evidence to be used by the state.

We have carefully considered the point in the light of the record on appeal and have concluded that the trial court erred in overruling defendant's objections to the admission of the shirt into evidence and that its admission was so prejudicial as to entitle the defendant to a new trial. It further appears that the trial court failed to make sufficient inquiry as to why the disclosure was not made, the prejudice to the other party, and the steps which may be taken, if any, to mitigate such prejudice. See: Ramirez v. State, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 744 and Cunningham v. State, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 391. See also: Richardson v. State, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 771, 774--776; and Williams v. State, Fla.App.1972, 264 So.2d 106, 108.

The judgment appealed is reversed with directions to grant the defendant a new trial.

It is so ordered.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wilcox v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 21 Marzo 1978
    ...3d DCA 1974); Rembert v. State, 284 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Carnivale v. State, 271 So.2d 793 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Garcia v. State, 268 So.2d 575 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Salamone v. State, 247 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA The state does not contest any of the above well-settled principles of cri......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 24 Julio 1975
    ...247 So.2d 780 (Fla.App.1971); Carnivale v. State, 271 So.2d 793 (Fla.App.1973), Cert. den., Fla., 277 So.2d 534; Cf. Garcia v. State, 268 So.2d 575 (Fla.App.1972) Cert. den., Fla., 273 So.2d 81.14 Watson v. State, supra, see Note 3 at p. ...
  • Carnivale v. State, 72--443
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 10 Enero 1973
    ...prejudice had resulted by such failure. The trial judge having failed to make proper inquiry, this cause must be reversed. Garcia v. State, Fla.App.1972, 268 So.2d 575. The other points raised by the appellant have been examined and found to be without merit, although it is noted that upon ......
  • State v. Garcia, 43171
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 8 Febrero 1973
    ...STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Pablo Montes GARCIA, Respondent. No. 43171. Supreme Court of Florida. Feb. 8, 1973. Certiorari denied. 268 So.2d 575. CARLTON, C.J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT