Garcia v. State, 42670
Decision Date | 22 April 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 42670,42670 |
Citation | 453 S.W.2d 822 |
Parties | Pedro GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Walter G. Weaver, Donna, for appellant.
Oscar B. McInnis, Dist. Atty., Edinburg, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The conviction is for burglary of a private residence at night; the punishment, seven years.
A summary of the evidence is taken from the State's brief, and is as follows:
hat which the Appellant was wearing, a matching shoe to the one found in the yard and a strange shoe which was tried and fit the Appellant in Court were found where the struggle occurred in the kitchen of the residence. About thirty minutes later, the Appellant was arrested in his automobile a short distance away. At the time of his arrest, he was barefoot, bleeding from two small puncture wounds on the back of his head and apparently, under the influence of alcohol. About three hours later, he was examined by a doctor who testified that the wounds were consistent with having been made with one of the spurs and that she did not observe anything unusual about Appellant's physical condition at that time.
In the first ground of error, appellant complains that the capias issued recited that appellant be arrested to answer to an indictment charging him with 'Burglary PRNT', and that such capias was illegal.
Appellant was not prosecuted on the capias but on an indictment which charged him with the offense of burglary of a private residence at night. No evidence was obtained or admitted because of the capias. Assuming that the abbreviation 'PRNT' for private residence at nighttime made the capias insufficient, no injury or harm has been shown.
The first ground of error is overruled.
In the second ground of error, it is contended that there was jury misconduct and reversible error, because when the jury was deliberating on punishment, it sent in the following question to the court, 'At what per cent of his sentence would he be eligible for parole as a repeater?' 1 The court recalled the jury to the courtroom and gave the following instruction:
'Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury:
The jury then returned a verdict of seven years. A like situation was presented in De La Rosa v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 28, 317 S.W.2d 544, and it was held that the action of the court was proper. The asking of the question, by itself, does not show jury misconduct.
The second ground of error is overruled.
Complaint is made in the third ground of error that the court erred in entering a judgment reciting that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ward v. State, 44142
...submitted by the jury to the court reflected jury misconduct. This contention was decided adversely to appellant in Carcia v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 822. We adhere to our ruling in that Finally, he argues that the trial court erred in refusing to compel the state to produce for his ......
-
Rodriguez v. State
...not the capias or arrest warrant, to determine what allegations are made as the basis of the revocation hearing. Garcia v. State, 453 S.W.2d 822, 823 (Tex.Crim.App.1970). So long as the motion provides adequate notice of the charges alleged, fundamental notions of fairness are satisfied, de......
-
Hernandez v. State
...which [Miles] was convicted." Miles , 468 S.W.3d at 738.The Court of Criminal Appeals reached similar decisions in Garcia v. State , 453 S.W.2d 822, 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970) (holding that trial court did not err when judgment read "Burglary PRNT" because indictment alleged and jury found ......
-
Marcum v. State
...or arrest warrant, to determine what allegations are made as the basis of the revocation hearing. See id. (citing Garcia v. State, 453 S.W.2d 822, 823 (Tex.Crim.App.1970)). As long as the motion provides adequate notice of the charges alleged, fundamental notions of fairness are satisfied, ......