Gardner v. Bean

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
CitationGardner v. Bean, 124 Mass. 347 (Mass. 1878)
Decision Date02 April 1878
PartiesAlbert M. Gardner & another v. Elizabeth T. Bean

Suffolk. Contract upon an account annexed for goods sold and delivered. Answer, a general denial. Writ dated April 12 1876.

At the trial in the Superior Court, before Dewey, J., the report of an auditor was introduced in evidence, who found that the credit was originally given to Hiram P. Bean, the husband of the defendant, and the bill charged to him upon the plaintiffs' books; that the goods were delivered to him that the was acting as agent for his wife; and that there was due the plaintiffs the sum of $ 379.16, with interest from the date of the writ. The auditor also found that fourteen days after the date of the writ in this action, the plaintiffs signed with other parties an involuntary petition in bankruptcy against Hiram P. Bean, wherein they stated he was owing them this same debt; that this petition was sworn to in due form by one of the plaintiffs; and that on this petition Bean was put into bankruptcy. The plaintiffs introduced evidence that after the charge and delivery of the goods to Hiram P. Bean, they were informed by him and ascertained that he was agent for the defendant, and that the goods sold by the plaintiffs were used in the erection of buildings on the land of the defendant. Upon these facts, the defendant asked the judge to rule that the goods having been sold to Hiram P. Bean, and the plaintiffs having afterwards sued his wife, the defendant, as principal, and having signed and sworn to a petition in bankruptcy, in which they made the statement that Hiram P. Bean was owing them this debt, they could not maintain this action. But the judge declined so to rule, and instructed the jury that the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Cartan, McCarthy & Co. v. David
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • April 1, 1884
    ...v. Freeman, 4 Ired. Eq. 312; Allen v. Fuller, 118 Mass. 402; Noursc v. Henshaw, 123 Mass. 96; Major v. Holmes, 124 Mass. 108; Gardner v. Bean, 124 Mass. 347; Kenworthy v. Sawyer, 125 Mass. 28; Goodnow v. Hill, 125 Mass. 587; Wood v. Orford, 52 Cal. 412; Parry v. Kelly, 52 Cal. 334; Marlow v......
  • Chi., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Mashore
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1908
    ...are as follows: Rich v. City of Minneapolis, 40 Minn. 82, 41 N.W. 455; Pope v. Allis, 115 U.S. 363, 6 S. Ct. 69, 29 L. Ed. 393; Gardner v. Bean, 124 Mass. 347; Hunter v. Hunter or Milam, 111 Cal. 261, 43 P. 756, 31 L.R.A. 411, 52 Am. St. Rep. 180; Thrall v. Thrall, 60 Wis. 503, 19 N.W. 353;......
  • Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Mashore
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • May 15, 1908
    ...are as follows: Rich v. City of Minneapolis, 40 Minn. 82, 41 N.W. 455; Pope v. Allis, 115 U.S. 363, 6 S.Ct. 69, 29 L.Ed. 393; Gardner v. Bean, 124 Mass. 347; Hunter v. Hunter or Milam, 111 Cal. 261, 43 P. 31 L. R. A. 411, 52 Am. St. Rep. 180; Thrall v. Thrall, 60 Wis. 503, 19 N.W. 353; Cowa......
  • Maynard v. Fabyan
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • May 29, 1929
    ...Sending a bill to her husband in the circumstances disclosed was evidence, though not conclusive, of an election to hold him. Gardner v. Bean, 124 Mass. 347;Dyer v. Swift, 154 Mass. 159, 162, 28 N. E. 8;Reid v. Miller, 205 Mass. 80, 85, 91 N. E. 223;Estes v. Aaron, 227 Mass. 96, 99, 116 N. ......
  • Get Started for Free