Gardner v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
Citation | 117 Mo. App. 138,93 S.W. 917 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
Decision Date | 13 March 1906 |
Parties | GARDNER v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Franklin County; R. S. Ryors, Judge.
Action by David N. Gardner against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
In 1904 plaintiff was a traveling salesman for a wholesale grocery house in the city of St. Louis. His territory was from Pacific, Mo., along the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad, to Dixon, Mo., in Pulaski county. To enable him to ride on the local freight trains of defendant company, plaintiff procured the following permit from its general manager:
During the year 1904 the defendant company had posted in all its ticket offices the following rules in respect to carrying passengers on local freight trains:
On September 4, 1904, the plaintiff was at Robertsville, in Franklin county, a station on defendant's road, with a grip containing samples, and wished to go to Moselle, a station on defendant's road about six miles west of Robertsville. A local freight train traveling west stopped at Robertsville to discharge some freight, and plaintiff presented his permit to the ticket agent at Robertsville and demanded a ticket to Moselle, offering to pay the regular fare. The agent was out of tickets and told the plaintiff to get into the caboose and show his permit to the conductor, pay his fare, and get a ticket at Moselle, and he thought the conductor...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cathey v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
... ... Blythe (Ark.), 126 S.W. 387; Hutchinson ... on Carriers (2 Ed.), 652; 28 Am. and Eng. Ency. Law (2 Ed.), ... 201; McGowen v. Railroad (La.), 5 L.R.A. 817; ... Reese v. Railroad (Pa.), 6 L.R.A. 530; Ammons v ... Railroad (N. C.), 51 S.E. 127; Cross v ... Railroad, 56 Mo.App. 664; Gardner v. Railroad, ... 117 Mo.App. 138; Woods v. Railroad, 48 Mo.App. 132; ... Bolles v. Railroad, 134 Mo.App. 705. (3) The ... plaintiff was not entitled to recover exemplary damages in ... this case, and the court erred in submitting the question of ... such damages to the jury. McNamara v ... ...
-
Ex Parte Helton
...93 S.W. 913 ... 117 Mo. App. 609 ... Ex parte HELTON ... St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri ... March 13, 1906 ... Rehearing Denied April 10, 1906 ... 1. GAME—PROTECTION—SHIPMENT—STATUTES ... Bradley v. West, 60 Mo. 33; State ex rel. v. Field, 119 Mo. 593, 24 S. W. 752; 1 Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 53. In Gardner v. Barney, Collector, etc., 6 Wall. 499, 18 L. Ed. 890, it was held that the journals of the legislative body might be consulted for the purpose of ... ...
-
Anderson v. International Harvester Co. of America
...526, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 221, 111 Am. St. 356; Hayes v. Railroad, 141 N. C. 195, 53 S. E. 847. To the contrary, see Gardner v. St. Louis, 117 Mo. App. 138, 93 S. W. 917. It may be that the words "wilful" and "unlawful" do not, under all circumstances, imply malice; but, when used by the cour......
-
Anderson v. International Harvester Co. of America
... ... 250, 62 A. 526, 3 ... L.R.A. (N.S.) 221, 111 Am. St. 356; Hayes v ... Railroad, 141 N.C. 195, 53 S.E. 847. To the contrary, ... see Gardner v. St. Louis, 117 Mo.App. 138, 93 S.W ... It may ... be that the words "wilful" and "unlawful" ... do not, under all ... ...