Garvin v. Wojcik
| Decision Date | 29 April 2016 |
| Docket Number | 373 CA 15-01415. |
| Citation | 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03359,138 A.D.3d 1488,31 N.Y.S.3d 719 |
| Parties | Donald J. GARVIN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Edward C. WOJCIK, Jr., Defendant–Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Chiacchia & Fleming, LLP, Hamburg (Daniel J. Chiacchia of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant.
Bouvier Partnership, LLP, Buffalo (Norman E.S. Greene of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, DeJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained while cutting down a tree on defendant's property. Plaintiff and a third party volunteered to help defendant remove trees from his property. Defendant told the parties which direction a certain tree needed to fall, and the parties decided to delimb the tree first. Using his own chainsaw and defendant's ladder, plaintiff started removing branches from the tree. Defendant positioned the ladder after each branch was removed. Plaintiff had cut almost all the way through one particular branch and commented to defendant and the third party, who were standing on the ground, that the branch was not sagging as he had expected it would. Plaintiff testified that either defendant or the third party or both told him to “just cut it.” Plaintiff continued cutting, and then the branch suddenly swung toward him and struck the ladder,causing him to fall to the ground and sustain injuries.
Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is well settled that a landowner owes those on his property a duty of “reasonable care under the circumstances” (Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868 ). Here, plaintiff was not injured owing to an unsafe condition on the property, but rather he was injured as “the direct result of the manner in which [he] engaged in a voluntary activity” on the property (Jarvis v. Eastman, 202 A.D.2d 826, 827, 609 N.Y.S.2d 683 ; see Macey v. Truman, 70 N.Y.2d 918, 919, 524 N.Y.S.2d 393, 519 N.E.2d 304, mot. to amend remittitur granted 71 N.Y.2d 949, 528 N.Y.S.2d 827, 524 N.E.2d 147 ). In support of his motion, defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that his participation in the injury-producing activity was not causally related to the accident (see Lichtenthal v. St. Mary's Church, 166 A.D.2d 873, 875, 561 N.Y.S.2d 134 ; cf. Macey, 70 N.Y.2d at 919–920, 524 N.Y.S.2d 393, 519 N.E.2d 304 ; Jones v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Gomez
...People v. Walston, 23 N.Y.3d 986, 990, 991 N.Y.S.2d 24, 14 N.E.3d 377 ). 30 N.Y.S.3d 468 Contrary to the People's contention, the 138 A.D.3d 1488 presumption of regularity does not apply to errors of this kind (see People v. Silva, 24 N.Y.3d 294, 299–300, 998 N.Y.S.2d 154, 22 N.E.3d 1022, r......
-
Parker v. Town of Alexandria
...6 N.Y.3d 410, 423, 813 N.Y.S.2d 18, 846 N.E.2d 448 ; Matter of Hynes v. Tomei, 92 N.Y.2d 613, 627, 684 N.Y.S.2d 177, 706 N.E.2d 1201, 31 N.Y.S.3d 719 cert. denied 527 U.S. 1015, 119 S.Ct. 2359, 144 L.Ed.2d 254 ).It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified......
-
Fernandez v. Castillo, 2016–13022
...( Macey v. Truman, 70 N.Y.2d at 919, 524 N.Y.S.2d 393, 519 N.E.2d 304 ), the defendant cannot be held liable (see Garvin v. Wojcik, 138 A.D.3d 1488, 1489, 31 N.Y.S.3d 719 ).Here, the defendant failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The defendant's ev......