Gary v. Foster Lumber Co., Inc., 4380

Decision Date29 January 1975
Docket NumberNo. 4380,4380
Citation531 P.2d 497
PartiesJuanita GARY, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. FOSTER LUMBER COMPANY, INC., and Gary A. Sidwell, Appellees (Defendantsbelow).
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

Phil N. Nash, Casper, for appellant.

Robert R. Rose, Jr., Casper, for appellees.

Before McEWAN, GUTHRIE, and McCLINTOCK, JJ.

McEWAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff general but no special damages. This case was initiated as a result of an automobile collision in Casper, Wyoming. The trial court determined as a matter of law the defendant driver Gary Sidwell was negligent and that his negligence was the proximate cause of the collision; that the plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence; and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover $50 for damages to her automobile. And the jury was so instructed.

The parties stipulated and the court instructed the jury that the defendant Sidwell was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the collision and his acts became those of the defendant Foster Lumber Company, Inc. They also stipulated, and the court instructed, that the plaintiff incurred hospital, drug and other bills in the sum of $3,889.38, for which the defendants denied liability. The plaintiff claimed total damages in the amount of $214,692.64. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the total amount of $950.00, designated as $50,00 for damages to her automobile and $900.00 for pain and suffering and disability, past, present and future.

After the verdict was returned but before the jury was released the plaintiff moved the court to have the jury re-instructed and returned for further deliberations, pursuant to § 1-132, W.S.1957. The court took the motion under advisement and later denied it and released the jury. The plaintiff filed motions for a new trial and for an order adding ot and increasing the jury's award, both of which were denied.

The plaintiff appealed and argued that the jury should have awarded her special damages in the sum of $3,889.38 and that the matter should be remanded for a new trial on the issue of special damages. The sole issue then before this court is whether or not the jury must award some special damages where it awarded general damages in the sum of $900 for pain and suffering. Although our task is unique and somewhat complicated because there is no transcript, we nonetheless determine that the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

The plaintiff stated that she 'recognizes that pain and suffering can exist separately from, and can be awarded without special damages under the proper circumstances-but those circumstances are not present here. In the case at Bar, even though an award of pain and suffering by itself may not have required an award of special damages to be consistent, the award of past, present and future pain and suffering and disability requires an award of special damages, at least to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • ABC Builders, Inc. v. Phillips
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 13, 1981
    ...Matter of Estate of Mora, Wyo., 611 P.2d 842, 846 (1980); Cox v. Vernieuw, Wyo., 604 P.2d 1353 (1980); Gary v. Foster Lumber Company, Inc., Wyo., 531 P.2d 497 (1975); DeWitty v. Decker, Wyo., 383 P.2d 734 (1963), and our decision to Negligence involves a recognizable danger which is apparen......
  • Halliburton Co. v. Claypoole
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • February 3, 1994
    ...for the most part, without meaningful objection. See City of Cheyenne v. Simpson, 787 P.2d 580, 582 (Wyo.1990); Gary v. Foster Lumber Co., Inc., 531 P.2d 497, 498 (Wyo.1975). We are unable to conclude that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion for new trial. WYO.R.C......
  • Angus Hunt Ranch, Inc. v. Bowen
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • November 16, 1977
    ...same, we will not consider it, Knudson v. Hilzer, Wyo., 551 P.2d 680, 686; Mader v. James, Wyo., 546 P.2d 190, 195; Gary v. Foster Lumber Co., Inc., Wyo., 531 P.2d 497, 498. Neither the dismissal nor the summary judgment was Affirmed. 1 In material part this affidavit stated:"I, Thomas L. R......
  • Harries v. State, 5686
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 26, 1982
    ...were, thus, presented to the jury, and the instructions (which were not objected to) became the law of the case. Gary v. Foster Lumber Company, Inc., Wyo., 531 P.2d 497 (1975); DeWitty v. Decker, Wyo., 383 P.2d 734 The jury could reasonably find beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant did ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT