Gaskill v. U.S., 83-1433
Decision Date | 18 April 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 83-1433,83-1433 |
Citation | 787 F.2d 1446 |
Parties | 86-1 USTC P 13,666 Glenn C. GASKILL, Executor of the Estate of Sophie B. Gaskill, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas; Frank G. Theis, J. (D.C. No. Civ. 82-1160).
William P. Wang, Atty., Dept. of Justice (Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup and Robert A. Bernstein, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C.), and Jim J. Marquez, U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., of counsel, for defendant-appellant.
Jack E. Dalton, (Michael A. Doll of Mangan, Dalton, Trenkle & Rebein Chartered, Dodge City, Kan., was also on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, SETH, Circuit Judge and BRIMMER, * United States District Judge.
This matter comes on for further consideration in light of the argument of counsel, the briefs, the record on appeal, and the opinion of the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas on the question certified to it in this cause, see Gaskill v. United States, 238 Kan. 238, 708 P.2d 552 (1985).
Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered that the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas entered January 31, 1983, 561 F.Supp. 73, is affirmed.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
* Honorable Clarence A. Brimmer, Chief Judge, District of Wyoming, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estate of Vissering v. C.I.R.
...of disposition but not to consume the proceeds did not create general power of appointment under § 2041(b)(1)(A)), aff'd mem., 787 F.2d 1446 (10th Cir.1986); see also Merchants Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 256, 261, 64 S.Ct. 108, 111, 88 L.Ed. 35 (1943) (invasion of trust corpus for......
-
CERTIFICATION COMES OF AGE: REFLECTIONS ON THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF COOPERATIVE JUDICIAL FEDERALISM.
...Heggie, 617 F.2d 589 (10th Cir. 1980) (per curiam) (habeas); Gaskill v. United States, 561 F. Supp. 73 (D. Kan. 1983) (tax), aff'd mem., 787 F.2d 1446 (10th Cir. (130) A review of the certifications across all circuits for calendar year 2019 revealed that over three-fourths of those cases w......