Gasperino v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
Decision Date | 14 June 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 18882.,18882. |
Citation | 107 S.W.2d 819 |
Parties | GASPERINO v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Thomas J. Seehorn, Judge.
Action by Mary Gasperino against the Prudential Insurance Company of America. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
John J. Cosgrove and Carl L. Anderson, both of Kansas City, for appellant.
William C. Michaels and Kenneth E. Midgley, both of Kansas City, (Ralph W. Hyatt, of Newark, N. J., and Michaels, Blackmar, Newkirk, Eager & Swanson, of Kansas City, of counsel), for respondent.
This is an action by the beneficiary, Mary Gasperino, on a policy of insurance on the life of Alexander Gasperino. The policy carries a double indemnity clause which provides for the payment of an additional sum of $1,000 in the event of the accidental death of the insured. The suit is for the recovery of the accidental benefit.
The provision in the policy as to the accidental death benefit is as follows:
"The amount of Accidental Death Benefit specified on the first page hereof shall be payable in addition to the Face Amount of Insurance immediately upon receipt of due proof that the death of the Insured occurred during the continuance of this Policy while there was no default in the payment of premium, as a result, directly and independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries, effected solely through external, violent and accidental means, of which, except in case of drowning or of internal injuries revealed by an autopsy, there is a visible contusion or wound on the exterior of the body, and that such death occurred within ninety days of the accident, provided, however, that no Accidental Death Benefit shall be payable if the death of the Insured resulted from suicide, while sane or insane; or from being in military or naval service in time of war; or from operating, or riding in, any kind of submarine or aircraft, whether as a passenger or otherwise; or from a state of war, riot or insurrection; or directly or indirectly from bodily or mental infirmity or disease in any form. * * *"
The suit was instituted in the circuit court of Jackson county, Mo., at Kansas City by the plaintiff on the filing of her petition therein on June 21, 1935, in which petition it is alleged that the policy of insurance sued on was issued by the defendant to one Alexander Gasperino and that, by its terms, the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff as beneficiary therein the sum of $1,000 upon the death of the insured from natural causes and an additional sum of $1,000 should the insured meet his death from external, violent, and accidental means independent of all other causes.
It further alleges that the insured on September 4, 1932, died as a result of external, violent, and accidental means, independent of all other causes, in that he accidentally took into his body polluted and poisonous water, which water contained the germ of typhoid fever, and that his death occurred as a direct result thereof. It is further alleged in said petition that the plaintiff is the beneficiary named in said policy; that due proof of death was made; that the defendant paid to her as such beneficiary the sum of $1,000, but has failed and refused to pay, after lawful demand made therefore, the additional sum of $1,000 due by reason of the accidental death of the insured; and that the defendant's refusal to pay such additional sum is without justifiable cause or excuse and is vexatious.
Judgment is sought in the petition for the sum of $1,000, together with interest and with damages equal to 10 per cent. of the face amount of the policy and an attorney's fee of $500 by reason of the alleged vexatious refusal to pay.
The defendant, on November 2, 1935, filed its amended answer, in which it alleges that it was its purpose to state in such amended answer all of the facts deemed by either the one or the other of the parties to be material to the issues involved, in order that the cause might be determined on the pleadings. Among other things, it admits the issuance of the policy declared on in the petition, of date October 13, 1930. The policy is set out in full in the amended answer. It admits the payment of all premiums due on said policy up to the time of the insured's death and admits the death of the insured on September 4, 1932. It admits thereafter due proofs of the death of the insured were made to it by the plaintiff and sets out said proofs, together with the attending physician's statement incorporated therein. In the attending physician's statement, it is stated that the immediate cause of the death was typhoid fever and that it was not due to accident.
It is further alleged in said amended answer that, upon the receipt of proofs of death by the defendant, at its home office, it issued to the plaintiff its check in the sum of $1,002.84 (in payment of the ordinary death benefit on said policy plus one month's premium refunded, which had been paid in advance); that the plaintiff cashed said check and received the money thereunder; that, thereafter, the plaintiff made claim for $1,000 additional for the alleged accidental death benefit sued for, which sum it refused to pay; and that, on such refusal, this suit resulted.
It alleges the facts to be as follows:
The defendant in such amended answer further denies each and every other allegation in the plaintiff's petition and alleges the facts to be as stated in such answer.
It is further stated in said amended answer that the plaintiff contended that, by reason of the facts as set out therein, the defendant was liable to her under the law and the policy provisions entitled "Provisions As to Accidental Death Benefit" and that such contention is denied by the defendant and that the defendant contends that, under such facts and the law and the said policy provisions, the defendant is not liable to the plaintiff for any accidental death benefits.
To the amended answer thus filed by the defendant, the plaintiff filed a demurrer as follows: "Comes now the plaintiff and demurs to the defendant's amended answer to plaintiff's petition as said amended answer does not state sufficient facts to constitute a defense to this action, and for the further reason that under the facts as alleged in said amended answer plaintiff is entitled to judgment upon her...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brannaker v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
... ... Gasperino v. Prudential Ins ... Co. of America, 107 S.W.2d 819; Burns v ... Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., 134 Ohio St. 222, ... 16 N.E.2d 316; Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co. (Tex ... Sup. Ct.), 182 S.W. 673; Chase v. Business Men's ... Assurance Co. (10 C. C. A.), 51 F.2d 34; Stedman v ... ...
-
Pope v. Business Men's Assur. Co. of America
...Berlau v. Met. L. I. Co., 224 Mo.App. 938, 24 S.W.2d 686; Jennings v. Natl. I. & A. Co., 226 Mo.App. 777, 46 S.W.2d 226; Gasperina v. Prud. I. Co., 107 S.W.2d 819; Christ v. P. Mut. L. I. Co., 144 N.W. Newsome v. Com. Cas. Co., 137 S.E. 456; Grab. v. Davis Const. Co., 109 S.W.2d 882; Camero......
-
Jacobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
... ... Fidelity & C. Co. 85 C.C.A. 343, ... 158 F. 1; Traveler's Ins. Co. v. Selden, 78 F ... 285; Carswell v. Railway Mail Asso. 8 F.2d ... [289 N.W. 595] ... In ... Pope v. Prudential Ins. Co. (C.C.A. 6th) 29 F.2d ... 185, the court calls attention to the ... held that deaths from the contraction of typhoid fever ... ( Gasperino v. Prudential Ins. Co. Mo.App. , 107 ... S.W.2d 819, 823); from ... ...
-
State ex rel. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Shain
... ... 825; Kennark v. Smith, 41 S.W.2d 381 ... ... Douglas, ... [127 S.W.2d 676] ... [344 ... Mo. 626] This is an original proceeding in certiorari to ... review for conflict the respondents' decision in the case ... of Mary Gasperino, Appellant, v. The Prudential Insurance ... Company of America, a Corporation, Respondent, 107 ... S.W.2d 819 ... The ... plaintiff is the beneficiary in an insurance policy which ... contains a provision for "double indemnity" in case ... the insured's death was the result ... ...