Gaston v. State
| Decision Date | 20 February 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 59431,59431 |
| Citation | 265 S.E.2d 866,153 Ga.App. 538 |
| Parties | GASTON v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Archibald A. Farrar, Jr., Summerville, for appellant.
William M. Campbell, Dist. Atty., Edgar A. Callaway, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
The defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial following his conviction for burglary. Held :
1. The victim testified that he found some of the stolen property on the defendant's premises shortly after the burglary and that the defendant later admitted his guilt to him. This was amply sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). The first three enumerations of error are without merit.
2. The victim's testimony that he was the owner-operator of the burglarized store rendered him competent to testify that the defendant, a former employee, had no authority to break into it. The witness' failure to explain his relationship to the corporation which was alleged in the indictment to own the store did not constitute a fatal omission. Had appellant's counsel sincerely believed at trial that the witness was not competent to testify on the defendant's lack of authority to enter, he was free to cross examine on the issue.
3. The trial court did not err in failing to hold a Jackson v. Denno hearing to test the voluntariness of the defendant's confession to the victim. Since the defendant was not under arrest or in custody at the time and no police or other law enforcement personnel were present, his constitutional rights could not have been violated. See Franklin v. State, 114 Ga.App. 304(4), 151 S.E.2d 191 (1966). In any event, neither the victim nor the defendant indicated there had been any coercion.
4. There was no error in admitting a photograph of a stolen chain saw which had been recovered by police and returned to the victim; nor did the trial court err in charging the jury on the law regarding possession of recently stolen property.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bozeman v. Tifton Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n, 63843
... ... § 96-1004 by amendment of its petition ... The Supreme Court of this state has addressed this issue in a case arising under the Retail Installment and Home Solicitation Sales Act (RIHSSA), Code Ann. § 96-901 et seq ... ...
-
Griffin v. State
...capacity and was, instead, a privately employed agent of the store. Based on this finding, the trial court, citing Gaston v. State, 153 Ga.App. 538, 539, 265 S.E.2d 866 (1980), determined that the defendants were not entitled to a separate hearing on the voluntariness of the statements at a......
-
McCall v. McCall, A00A1178.
... ... process rights were abrogated by undue interference with her legal and constitutional rights to parent the children without intrusion by the State ... Judgment reversed ... ANDREWS, P.J., and ELLINGTON, J., concur ... ...
-
Ray v. State
...or in custody at the time of such questioning, so that his constitutional rights could not have been violated. Gaston v. State, 153 Ga.App. 538, 539(3), 265 S.E.2d 866 (1980). Therefore, no Jackson-Denno hearing was 3. In his third enumeration, Ray asserts that the evidence was insufficient......