Gates v. Gates, 432A84
| Decision Date | 08 January 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 432A84,432A84 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Claudine Johnson GATES (Speiser) v. Roy Lee GATES. |
J. Calvin Cunningham and Charles E. Frye, III, Lexington, for plaintiff-appellant.
Brinkley, Walser, McGirt, Miller & Smith, by Charles H. McGirt and Stephen W. Coles, Lexington, for defendant-appellee.
VAUGHN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
11 cases
-
Stachlowski v. Stach
...327 N.C. 139, 394 S.E.2d 174 (1990); Gates v. Gates, 69 N.C.App. 421, 425-26, 317 S.E.2d 402, 405 (1984), aff'd per curiam, 312 N.C. 620, 323 S.E.2d 920 (1985); Kahan v. Longiotti, 45 N.C.App. 367, 371, 263 S.E.2d 345, 348, rev. denied, 300 N.C. 374, 267 S.E.2d 675 (1980), overruled on othe......
-
Morris v. Bailey
...under the third paragraph of Rule 58. See Gates v. Gates, 69 N.C.App. 421, 425-26, 317 S.E.2d 402, 405 (1984), aff'd, 312 N.C. 620, 323 S.E.2d 920 (1985). The written judgment did not determine any issue different from those dealt with in the judgment announced in open court. Therefore, def......
-
Brower v. Brower
...attempt his own modification between 1979 and 1984. Gates v. Gates, 69 N.C.App. 421, 317 S.E.2d 402 (1984), aff'd per curiam, 312 N.C. 620, 323 S.E.2d 920 (1985); Tilley v. Tilley, 30 N.C. App. 581, 227 S.E.2d 640 (1976). There is no evidence of an agreement between the parties to modify ch......
-
Norton v. Norton
...circumstances...." As this Court emphasized in Gates v. Gates, 69 N.C.App. 421, 317 S.E.2d 402 (1984),aff'd per curiam, 312 N.C. 620, 323 S.E.2d 920 (1985), the trial court need not order a reduction in child support, if the present needs of the minor child, who continues to be covered by t......
Request a trial to view additional results