Gates v. State, 87-3063
| Decision Date | 04 January 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-3063,87-3063 |
| Citation | 535 So.2d 359,14 Fla. L. Weekly 157 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 157 Richard GATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Indian River County; L.B. Vocelle, judge.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
The record shows that during the oral pronouncement of sentence, the trial judge made inconsistent statements concerning whether he intended to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences on appellant. The sentences rendered maintained this inconsistency. Therefore, we affirm appellant's convictions and remand this cause to the trial court with directions to clarify the sentences imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate.
AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tory v. State
...trial court to clarify the sentence imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate. See Gates v. State, 535 So.2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); see also Jackson v. State, 615 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Newton v. State, 603 So.2d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA Appellant next co......
- Sun Bank/South Florida Nat. Ass'n v. Bishop