Gates v. State

Decision Date24 February 1960
Docket NumberNo. 31572,31572
Citation332 S.W.2d 333
PartiesCarter Lee GATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Clyde W. Woody, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Jack J. Rawitscher, Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 5 days in jail and a fine of $100.

This is an attempted appeal. The fine has been satisfied, the jail term served, and the term of court ended. This Court has no jurisdiction to entertain such appeal. Article 826, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.

Treated as an original application for writ of habeas corpus, we find no merit in appellant's contention that the judgment is void because he was not present when his motion for new trial was overruled. Had the court not acted on his motion for new trial, it would have been overruled by operation of law within 20 days after its filing. Article 755, V.A.C.C.P., and Barton v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 582, 310 S.W.2d 90.

The appeal is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Carrillo v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • May 24, 1972
    ...is not confined and The question raised by his appeal has become moot. . . . The appeal is ordered dismissed.'); Gates v. State, 332 S.W.2d 333 (Tex.Cr.App.1960) ('The fine has been satisfied, the jail term served, and the term of court ended. This Court Has no jurisdiction to entertain suc......
  • Gonzalez v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • December 8, 2010
    ...in his absence when trial counsel was present, announced ready, and made no objection to his absence from the hearing); see also Gates v. State, 332 S.W.2d 333. 334 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960) (holding judgment of conviction was not void when defendant was not present when his motion for new tri......
  • Fouke v. State, 50560
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 26, 1975
    ...(1948); Winkler v. State, 252 S.W.2d 944 (Tex.Cr.App.1952); Woodard v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 634, 295 S.W.2d 659 (1956); Gates v. State, 332 S.W.2d 333 (Tex.Cr.App.1960); Ex parte Dancer, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 381, 350 S.W.2d 544 (1961); Hogan v. Turland, 430 S.W.2d 720 On June 14, 1974, at the sent......
  • Hogan v. Turland, 11531
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 31, 1968
    ...214 S.W.2d 791; Woodard v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 634, 295 S.W.2d 659; Ex parte Dancer, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 381, 350 S.W.2d 544; Gates v. State, 332 S.W.2d 333 (Tex.Cr.App.1960); Winkler v. State, 252 S.W.2d 944 In Winkler v. State the court held, 'The fine assessed and all costs adjudged against a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT