Gault v. Soldani
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BATES |
| Citation | Gault v. Soldani, 34 Mo. 150 (Mo. 1863) |
| Decision Date | 31 July 1863 |
| Parties | WILLIAM J. GAULT, Defendant in Error, v. JOHN SOLDANI, Plaintiff in Error. |
Error to Kansas City Common Pleas Court.
H. B. Bouton, for plaintiff in error.
I. Defendant's motion in arrest should have been sustained; the petition does not allege a cause of action. (R. C. 1855, p. 1065, Mechanic's Lien, § 1 & 6; Briggs et al. v. Worrel & Fields, 33 Mo. 157; Heltzell v. Langford et al. 33 Mo. 396.)
II. The court erred in causing an inquiry of damages to be made at the same term in which the interlocutory judgment was rendered. (R. C. 1855, p. 1280, § 10; Hopkins v. McGee, 33 Mo. 312.)
This was a suit to recover the value of work and labor performed, and material furnished, by plaintiff for defendant, in the construction of a dwelling-house for the defendant, and to enforce his lien upon the said premises.
Plaintiff was the contractor, and the suit is brought under the general law relating to mechanics' liens. Process was duly served upon the defendant, but failing to answer judgment was taken against him; whereupon he filed his motion in arrest of judgment, upon the ground that the petition did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; which motion was overruled, and the cause is now brought here by writ of error.
The plaintiff in error complains of certain irregularities in the form of the judgment, but no point was made or exception taken, in reference to them, in the court below, and they therefore will not be considered here. The court, however, should have sustained the motion in arrest, for the petition is radically defective.
The act provides that the petition, among other things, shall allege the facts necessary for securing a lien under the act. To entitle a contractor to such a lien, he is required by the court to file with the clerk of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
McDermott v. Claas
...1 Johnson's R. 470; Bartlett v. Crozier, 17 Johns., star p. 456; Jones on Liens, sec. 1587; Black on Tax Titles, sec. 262; Gault v. Soldani, 34 Mo. 150. An objection to the introduction of any evidence, on the ground that the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of......
-
Berkshire Lumber Co. v. J. S. Chick Investment Co.
...is fatally defective in not alleging ten days' notice of intention to file mechanic's lien. Heltzell v. Haynes, 35 Mo. 482; Gault v. Soldani, 34 Mo. 150; Baker Smallwood, 161 Mo.App. 257. (3) The court was not authorized in sustaining a lien against the interest of appellants in the propert......
-
Grace v. Nesbit
... ... Petition must allege the facts necessary ... for securing lien. R. S. 1879, sec. 3179; Heltzler v ... Langford, 43 Mo. 396; Gault v. Soldani, 34 Mo ... 150; Bradish v. James, 83 Mo. 313; Schulenburg ... v. Prairie Home, 65 Mo. 295. Because petition counts on ... separate and ... ...
-
Ewing v. Donnelly
...in the plaintiff's petition, which are essential to give him a lien, is fatal to the proceeding. Heltzell v. Langford, 33 Mo. 396; Gault v. Soldani, 34 Mo. 150; Bradish v. James, 83 Mo. 313. True it is that technical precision is not required in statements filed before a justice. City of Ka......