Gauss v. H. N. Hartwell Co.
| Decision Date | 14 January 1959 |
| Citation | 155 N.E.2d 415,338 Mass. 353 |
| Parties | Kathleen M. GAUSS v. H. N. HARTWELL CO., Inc. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Edward J. Barshak, Boston, for plaintiff.
Philander S. Ratzkoff, Boston, for defendant.
Before WILKINS, C. J., and RONAN, WILLIAMS, COUNIHAN and WHITTEMORE, JJ.
These are the plaintiff's exceptions to the direction of verdicts for the defendant in an action of tort for negligently causing the death and conscious suffering of the plaintiff's intestate, William E. Gauss. The case, like McPadden v. W. J. Halloran Co., Mass. 154 N.E.2d 582, decided December 5, 1958, involves application of the doctrine of common employment under § 18 of the workmen's compensation act (G.L. c. 152) and is controlled by that case. There was no error.
The jury could have found facts as follows: Gauss was an employee of Eastern Fuel Company (Eastern) which was a wholly owned subsidiary of the defendant (Hartwell). Hartwell's business was 'wholesale coal.' Eastern 'was a retail coal company.' Pursuant to an arrangement between Eastern and Hartwell, Gauss had on several occasions filled a coal truck of Eastern from a hopper under Hartwell's control on the Nystic docks. He was engaged in such activity on August 14, 1953, when the accident occurred which caused his death. The coal was to be delivered to a customer of Hartwell to whom the coal was being sold by Hartwell and the delivery was to be in consummation of that sale 'under an agreement whereby the defendant had hired * * * [Eastern] to make the delivery from the Mystic docks to * * * [the customer's] place of business.' Hartwell owned no trucks. Except for the occasions when purchasers 'picked up coal for themselves' Hartwell used transportation companies to deliver coal sold by it. Some of Hartwell's customers were retail coal dealers who used their own trucks to 'pick up' at the Mystic docks coal sold to them by Hartwell. In terms of total sales 'it was not fair to say that most of the sales of coal made by * * * [Hartwell] in 1953 were to retailers.' Both Hartwell and Eastern were insured under the act and at the time of the trial Gauss' dependents had been receiving benefits from Eastern's insurer. Gauss had not reserved common-law rights.
We think that, as in the McPadden case, it was plainly shown that the work which the subcontractor was doing was immersed in the work which the principal contractor had...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bulpett v. Dodge Associates, Inc.
...the jury. McPadden v. W. J. Halloran Co., 338 Mass. 189, 192, 154 N.E.2d 582 (1958); Afienko, supra. See Gauss v. H. N. Hartwell Co., Inc., 338 Mass. 353, 354-355, 155 N.E.2d 415 (1959); Amorosso v. Farina Bros. Co., Inc., 339 Mass. 595, 596, 161 N.E.2d 761 (1959); Pettiti v. McHugh, 341 Ma......
-
Tindall v. Denholm & McKay Co.
...R., 337 Mass. 369, 375, 149 N.E.2d 661. McPadden v. W. J. Halloran Co., 338 Mass. 189, 192, 154 N.E.2d 582. Gauss v. H. N. Hartwell Co., Inc., 338 Mass. 353, 354-355, 155 N.E.2d 415. Amorosso v. Farina Bros. Co., Inc., 339 Mass. 595, 596, 161 N.E.2d The following facts, which are undisputed......
-
Campinha v. James J. Devine, Inc.
...337 Mass. 369, 149 N.E.2d 661 (1958), McPadden v. W. J. Halloran Co., 338 Mass. 189, 154 N.E.2d 582 (1958); Gauss v. H. N. Hartwell Co., Inc., 338 Mass. 353, 155 N.E.2d 415 (1959); Pettiti v. Edward J. McHugh & Son, Inc., 341 Mass. 566, 171 N.E.2d 169 (1960); Tindall v. Denholm & McKay Co.,......
-
Pettiti v. Edward J. McHugh & Son, Inc.
...warranting a finding to the contrary. McPadden v. W. J. Halloran Co., 338 Mass. 189, 192, 154 N.E.2d 582. Gauss v. H. N. Hartwell Co. Inc., 338 Mass. 353, 155 N.E.2d 415; Amorosso v. Farina Bros. Co. Inc., 339 Mass. 595, 161 N.E.2d 761. Although it has never been decided, there can be no do......