Gavagan v. Marshall
Decision Date | 13 February 1948 |
Citation | 160 Fla. 154,33 So.2d 862 |
Parties | GAVAGAN v. MARSHALL et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; A. D. McNeill judge.
Evan T Evans, of Jacksonville, for appellant.
J. Henry Blount, of Jacksonville, for appellees.
The material portions of the record on appeal are: (1) The alternative writ of mandamus; (2) respondent's motion to quash; (3) order quashing the alternative writ; (4) entry of appeal; (5) assignments of error. When these matters were certified to there was no occasion for the record containing more, and all other matters need only have been recited.
The appellant-relator procured an alternative writ of mandamus reciting that, as Justice of the Peace of the Fifth District of Duval County, he held a coroner's inquest making inquiry as to the cause of the death of Hal William Skinner who died under circumstances giving rise to a good reason to believe that his death was caused by the criminal act of another and prompted thereby held such inquest as provided by his constitutional power and the laws of this State relative thereto; that he filed with the County Commissioners of such county his requisition for the correct amount of costs, in the sum of $14.65, which requisition was disapproved and disallowed by said Board because 'no direction from the Judge, the prosecuting attorney or some assistant prosecuting attorney of a court having trial jurisdiction of felonies committed in Duval County, Florida, was attached to said cost bill, as purported to be required by the provisions of Section 936.03 F.S.A.' (Section 3 of Chapter 21965, Acts of 1943).
The alternative writ further recited that 'the said Section 936.03, F.S.A., known also as Section 3 of Chapter 21965, Acts of 1943, is unconstitutional, invalid and void and of no force or effect whatsoever; that in consequence of the invalidity of said statute, the respondents have no lawful rights or authority to withhold approval for payment of relator's cost bill.'
The trial judge, upon a hearing of respondent'-appellees' motion to quash said alternative writ, granted same and thereupon petitioner brought this appeal.
The Constitution vests the judicial power of the state in specified courts, including justices of the peace. (See art. 5, Sec. 1, Constitution of State of Florida). And provides as to jurisdiction that: '* * * Justices of the peace shall have the power to hold inquest of the dead. * * *' Sec. 22, art. 5, Constitution of State of Florida.
The statutory provisions as to when an inquest shall or may be held, and when compensable, are as follows: Sec. 936.01, F.S.1941, F.S.A. 'Inquests may be taken:
'(1) Of all violent, sudden and casual deaths where there are no eyewitness or eyewitnesses to the killing or cause of death, and such deaths occur under circumstances indicating that death was caused by some criminal act or was the result of criminal negligence;
'(2) Of all sudden deaths in prison or other state, county, municipal and such public institutions, without an attending physician;
'(3) Of all dead bodies found within the county, whether of persons known or unknown, when there are no known eyewitness or eyewitnesses and it is apparent, from the body or the surrounding circumstances, that death was caused by some criminal act or was the result of criminal negligence, or when the deceased died or disappeared under circumstances indicating foul play; and,
Sec. 936.02, F.S.1941, F.S.A.
Sec. 936.03, F.S.1941, F.S.A.
Concerning compensation to public officers, this Court, in the case of Rawls et al., as County Commissioners, v. State ex rel. Nolan, 98 Fla. 103, 122 So. 222, headnote 1, has held: 'Public officers have no claim for official services rendered, except when, and to the extent that, compensation is provided by law, and when no compensation is so provided rendition of such services is deemed to be gratuitous.'
The above case was decided in 1929, and in a later case, State ex rel. Landis v. Reardon et al., 114 Fla. 755, 154 So. 868, decided in 1934, this Court quoted with approval the exact language quoted above from the Nolan case.
In the Nolan case, supra, quoting from the opinion, this Court further said: 'It is competent for the Legislature to prescribe that the compensation of county officers shall be confined to that allowed for services rendered the public, as in assessing or collecting one class of taxes without any allowance for assessing or collecting other classes of taxes.'
Also in the much later case of State ex rel. May v. Fussell, et al., 157 Fla. 55, 24 So.2d 804, 805, this Court again used the same language quoted above from the Nolan case, and further said:
'The duties of a public officer may be exacted without specific compensation'
and
'Such statutes are strictly construed * * *.'
A somewhat related statute to the one here under consideration is to be found in Section 939.14, F.S.A., which we quote: 'When a committing magistrate holds to bail or commits any person to answer a criminal charge in a county court, a criminal court of record, or a circuit court, and an information is not filed nor an indictment found against such person, the costs of such committing trial shall not be paid by the county, except the costs for executing the warrant.'
The above statute was under attack in the case of Barrow et al. v. State ex rel. Campbell, 77 Fla. 773, 82 So. 293, 294, and this court upheld the same. Pertinent parts of the opinion in said case, we quote: (Italics supplied).
In 43 American Jurisprudence, Page 134, we find the following: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Borchert, Application of
...State of Indiana v. Schelton, 1933, 205 Ind. 416, 186 N.E. 772; State v. Gonzales, 1939, 43 N.M. 498, 95 P.2d 673; Gavagan v. Marshall, 1948, 160 Fla. 154, 33 So.2d 862. The respondent cites no cases in this, or any jurisdiction in the United States, where a fee justice court having safegua......
-
Flack v. Graham
...position indicate the appropriate rule and that de jure officers should receive the emoluments of their office. See Gavagan v. Marshall, 160 Fla. 154, 33 So.2d 862 (1948); State ex rel. Williams v. Lee, 121 Fla. 815, 164 So. 536 (1935); State ex rel. Hatton v. Joughin, 103 Fla. 877, 138 So.......
-
Newsome-Goudeau v. Louisiana
...the individual's private interests." LeJeune v. Causey, 93-0455 (La. App. 1 Cir. 3/11/94); 634 So. 2d 34, 37 (citing Gavagan v. Marshall, 33 So. 2d 862, 867 (Fla. 1948)). On this basis, the court affirmed dismissal of a coroner alleged to have negligently failed to perform an autopsy, to in......
-
METRO-DADE FIRE RESCUE v. METRO. DADE COUNTY, 3D02-486.
...repeatedly quoted with approval by the Florida Supreme Court and lower courts throughout the state. See, e.g., Gavagan v. Marshall, 160 Fla. 154, 33 So.2d 862, 864 (1948); State ex rel. Landis v. Reardon, 114 Fla. 755, 154 So. 868, 871 (1934); Pridgeon v. Folsom, 181 So.2d 222, 226 (Fla. 1s......