Gay v. City of Gainesville

Decision Date23 May 1966
Docket NumberNo. H-337.,H-337.
Citation186 So.2d 41
PartiesCharles Bateman GAY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard J. Wilson, Gainesville, for petitioner.

Osee R. Fagan, Gainesville, for respondent.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review by certiorari of a final judgment rendered by the Circuit Court of Alachua County sitting in its appellate capacity. By its judgment the court dismissed petitioner's appeal from a judgment rendered by the municipal court of the City of Gainesville which found and adjudged petitioner guilty of violating an ordinance of the city.

Petitioner's appeal from the municipal court to the circuit court is governed by Part 6 of the Florida Appellate Rules.1 The rule requires that petitioner file and serve his brief in support of the appeal within thirty days after filing the transcript of record. This date, according to the chronology of pleading filed in the cause, was October 17, 1965.2 Petitioner's brief was not filed within the time limited by the rule, nor was any order extending the time for filing the brief either sought or rendered by the court. Despite this, counsel for respondent, in response to oral requests by counsel for petitioner, delayed taking any defensive action in the cause for two successive ten day periods before filing a motion to dismiss the appeal. Upon consideration of this motion, a final judgment was rendered by the circuit court dismissing petitioner's appeal for failure to file his brief within the time required by the rule. Petitioner filed a petition for rehearing asking that the order of dismissal be set aside, and the merits of the appeal be considered without the necessity of either party filing briefs as permitted by the rule relating to appellate review by circuit courts.3 The court entered an order denying the petition for rehearing and refusing to set aside its final judgment of dismissal. In this order the court recited that in connection with its consideration of the petition for rehearing it had reviewed the record on appeal in light of the assignments of error and was of the opinion that the record supports the judgment of the municipal court of which review was sought by the appeal.

Petitioner Gay seeks a writ of certiorari by this court quashing the judgment of dismissal rendered by the Circuit Court of Alachua County on the primary ground that the court's action in dismissing his appeal, and in denying his petition for rehearing, constitutes an arbitrary and capricious abuse of discretion under the facts and circumstances of the case.

The scope of review permitted in common law certiorari proceedings is strictly limited. It may not be used for the purpose of affording a second appeal, nor to produce the merits of the case for review. A common law writ of certiorari issues in the sound judicial discretion of the court, the function of which is to cause the entire record of an inferior court to be brought up in order that it may be determined from the face thereof whether the inferior court has exceeded its jurisdiction, or has not proceeded according to the essential requirements of law. Confined to its legitimate scope, the writ may issue in the court's discretion to correct the procedure of an inferior court which has failed to observe those requirements of law which are deemed to be essential to the administration of justice.4

The question presented for our decision is whether the Circuit Court of Alachua County, sitting in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, departed from the essential requirements of law in dismissing petitioner's appeal for failure to file his brief within the time limited by the rule, or in denying the petition for rehearing filed by petitioner seeking to have the judgment of dismissal set aside...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State ex rel. Christian v. Rudd, W--313
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 5, 1974
    ...they have not observed those requirements of law deemed to be essential to the administration of justice. In Gay v. City of Gainesville, Fla.App.1st 1966, 186 So.2d 41, we '* * * A common law writ of certiorari issues in the sound judicial discretion of the court, the function of which is t......
  • Fritz v. Norflor Const. Co., 80-299
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 20, 1980
    ...order departed from the essential requirements of law. In Re Dahl's Estate, 125 So.2d 332 (Fla.2d DCA 1960); Gay v. City of Gainesville, 186 So.2d 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); Ormond Beach First National Bank v. Montgomery Roofing Company, 189 So.2d 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), cert. denied 200 So.2......
  • State v. Hughes
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 1968
    ...decline to exercise our discretion in entertaining the petition. See: Brinson v. Tharin, 99 Fla. 696, 127 So. 313; Gay v. City of Gainesville, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 41. Petition for certiorari 1 For future guidance of counsel, we point out that appeals pursuant to this statute are of an i......
  • Sharretts v. State, 65-669.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 24, 1966
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT