Gay v. Roanoke R. & Lumber Co
Decision Date | 23 September 1908 |
Citation | 62 S.E. 436,148 N.C. 336 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | GAY. v. ROANOKE R. & LUMBER CO. et al. |
Where, in an action for injury to land, defendant in open court admitted that plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the land, and plaintiff in his direct examination claimed damages resulting from the burning of the timber on the land, it was competent by way of direct impeachment of him to ask him if some one else did not own the timber.
Where the language of a contract is free from ambiguity, its construction is for the court.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 11, Contracts, §§ 767-770.]
One contracting to cut for another his timber into saw logs, and deliver the logs over tram roads built at his own expense, to load a specified number of feet per day for each working day, to cut the timber in workmanlike manner, to pay for any delays, resulting from a failure to securely load the logs, etc., for a specified sum per M feet, for merchantable logs, cut, hauled, and delivered, is an independent contractor within the definition that an independent contractor is one who undertakes to produce a given result, but so that, in the actual execution of the work, he is not under the order or control of persons for whom he does it, and he uses his own discretion in things not specified.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 34, Master and Servant, §§ 1242, 1243.
For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, vol. 4, pp. 3542-3543; vol. 8, p. 7686.]
Where a contract is for something that may be lawfully done, and it is proper in its terms, and there has been no negligence in selecting a suitable person in respect to it, and no general control is reserved in respect to the manner of doing it, and the person for whom the work is to be done is interested only in the ultimate result, and not in the several steps as it progresses, he is not liable to third persons for the negligence of the contractor.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 34, Master and Servant, §§ 1245-1253.]
Appeal from Superior Court, Greene County; Lyon, Judge.
Action by B. R. Gay against the Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed, and new trial awarded.
The following is the contract between the Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Company and Jackson Bros., referred to in the opinion:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Texas Co. v. Jackson
... ... McBride v. Jerry Madden Shingle Co., 173 Mich. 248, ... 138 N.W. 1077; Knowlton v. Hoit, 67 N.H. 155, 30 A ... 346; Gay v. Roanoke R. R. & Lbr. Co., 148 N.C. 336, ... 62 S.E. 436; Scales v. First State Bank, 88 Or. 490, ... 172 P. 499; Barnard v. Coffin, 55 Am. Rep. 443; ... ...
-
Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College
... ... discussed and defined by this and other courts as well as by ... testwriters. Young v. Fosburg Lumber Co., 147 N.C ... 26, 60 S.E. 654; Gay v. Roanoke R. & Lumber Co., 148 N.C ... 336, 62 S.E. 436; Denny v. Burlington, 155 N.C. 33, ... 70 S.E ... ...
-
Moore v. Phillips
...every thing was done according to the contract." It was held that the relation of independent contractor existed. Gay v. Roanoke R. & Lumber Co., 148 N.C. 336, 62 S.E. 436, involved a contract for the cutting and transportation of logs, similar to the one in the case at bar. The logs were t......
-
Moore and Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Phillips
... ... should keep present at all times a superintendent and ... clerk--"to see that everything was done according to the ... contract." It was held that the relation of independent ... contractor existed ... ... Gay v. Roanoke R. & Lbr. Co., 148 N.C. 336, ... 62 S.E. 436, involved a contract for the cutting and ... transportation of logs, similar to the one in the case at ... bar. The logs were to be cut and loaded on railroad cars, ... "in a proper manner, the logs being secured to stand ... transportation, and ... ...