Gay v. Southern Builders, Inc.
Decision Date | 21 July 1953 |
Citation | 66 So.2d 499 |
Parties | GAY v. SOUTHERN BUILDERS, Inc. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Fred M. Burns, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lewis H. Tribble, Tallahassee, for appellant.
J. Lewis Hall and W. K. Whitfield, Tallahassee, for appellee.
This is an appeal from a final judgment entered by the Judge of the Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida.
It appears that Southern Builders, Inc., the appellee, entered into a contract with the Board of Commissioners of State Institutions of the State of Florida, whereby the appellee agreed to construct an Infirmary at the State Hospital in Chattahoochee, Florida, and a new wing on the State Capitol Building. Certain differences arose between the parties whereby the Board contended the building was not constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications, and the appellee contended that it was entitled to payment under the contract, and also damages for breach of the contract.
The contractor eventually filed a claim with and against the Board setting forth his claims for various items called for in the contract, which had not been paid and various items of damage because the contract had not been complied with by the Board. Thereafter, three persons were named and were called 'arbitrators.' They held hearings and investigations as to the contentions of the parties and made their report to the Board together with supporting data. Thereafter, at a meeting of the Board on July 20, 1948, the Minutes of the Board show that there was a general discussion of the matter and after such discussion, motion was made by the State Treasurer, and seconded by the Secretary of State, which was 'unanimously adopted', that the report of the Arbitration be approved for final payment. It appears that this action on the part of the Board was not only unanimous, but also was made voluntarily. It does not appear anywhere in the record that they adopted the report because the members thought they were bound by it.
It is unnecessary for us to discuss or decide in this opinion the binding force and effect of an arbitration agreement and we do not decide that question. The Board adopted the report of the three men appointed.
The Comptroller paid all of the amounts set forth as approved by the Board, except $25,608.82. The Comptroller decided that this amount was for tort arising out of breach of contract and he refused to pay same.
In his original claim after the contract was breached, the contractor claimed such damages not in tort but for breach of contract. We have repeatedly held that where damages result from a breach of contract, the party may make his claim based upon such breach of contract even though a tort may have been committed. In the case of Holbrook v. City of Sarasota, Fla., 58 So.2d 862, 864, this Court said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Victor Chemical Works v. Gay
...of fair dealing that the State should set the example. See State ex rel. Wadkins v. Owens, Fla., 62 So.2d 403 and Gay v. Southern Builders, Inc., Fla., 66 So.2d 499. And we have applied the same principel to political subdivisions of the State. In Webb v. Hillsborough County, 128 Fla. 471, ......
-
Aerojet-General Corporation v. Kirk
...rights or liabilities. Daniell v. Sherrill, Fla.1950, 48 So.2d 736; McCarty v. Booth, Fla.1954, 69 So.2d 655; Gay v. Southern Builders, Inc., Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 499. In construing this Lease-Option, therefore, the Court may look to Florida law on such contracts without regard to the public ......
-
Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co.
...the agreement, express or implied, and a tort, the tort may be waived and the injured party may sue on the contract. Gay v. Southern Builders, Inc., 66 So.2d 499 (Fla.1953); Doyle v. City of Coral Gables, 159 Fla. 802, 33 So.2d 41 In Bondu, the defendant physician and hospital owed a duty t......
-
Graham Contracting, Inc. v. Department of General Services, s. KK-284
...Court of the Twelfth Jud. Circuit v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 339 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1976), impliedly receding from Gay v. Southern Builders, Inc., 66 So.2d 499 (Fla.1953); State ex rel. Division of Administration, Dept. of Transp. v. Oliff, 350 So.2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). See also Circu......