Gaylord v. McCoy

Citation77 S.E. 959,161 N.C. 685
PartiesGAYLORD v. McCOY et al.
Decision Date09 April 1913
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Brunswick County; Bragaw, Judge.

Action by George O. Gaylord against M. E. McCoy and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Where a vendor, in an option contract to convey described real estate free from liens, tendered a deed which omitted a part of the land, and notified the purchaser that the other part would not be conveyed and that liens would not be taken care of, he breached the contract rendering a tender of the price unnecessary.

Where a vendor, required to execute a deed free from incumbrances tendered a deed which omitted a part of the land, and notified the purchaser that the omitted part would not be conveyed and that liens would not be provided for, and the purchaser demanded a deed according to contract, and the vendor, before the time for performance, renewed his refusal to execute a deed and satisfy judgments, the vendor breached the contract, making a tender unnecessary.

See also, 158 N.C. 325, 74 S.E. 321.

This is an action to compel specific performance of the following option executed by the defendants, which was duly probated and was registered July 6, 1909: "Know all men by these presents, that in consideration of the sum of four hundred dollars ($400) paid by George O. Gaylord, of Wilmington state of North Carolina, to the undersigned parties, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, we, Mrs. M. E McCoy, widow of the late L. C. McCoy, of Brunswick county, state of North Carolina, C. L. McCoy and wife, Lutie McCoy, of Laurinburg, state of North Carolina, Charles F. McCoy, of Cameron, state of South Carolina, and F. M. McCoy and wife, Rosa M. McCoy, of Wilmington, state of North Carolina, do hereby contract and agree with the said George O. Gaylord, to sell and convey unto the said George O. Gaylord and his heirs and assigns all that certain tract or parcel of land situate, lying and being in Northwest township, Brunswick county, state of North Carolina, adjoining the lands of M. W. Murrell, B. T. Trimmer, Z. E. Murrell, the Metts estate, and lying on both sides of the Carolina Central Railroad, known as the L. C. McCoy place, and the same on which Mrs. M. E. McCoy resides at the present time; the said tract of land containing fifteen hundred acres, more or less, and lies on the waters of Mill creek and near the waters of Hood's creek, and is all of the land owned by Mrs. M. E. McCoy, C. L. McCoy and wife, Charles McCoy and wife, and F. M. McCoy and wife, in the county of Brunswick, state of North Carolina; and that we will execute and deliver to said George O. Gaylord and his heirs and assigns, at his or their request, on or before the 3d day of November, 1909, a good and sufficient deed for the said lands, with full covenants and warranty, and free from all incumbrances; provided and upon condition, nevertheless, that the said George O. Gaylord, his heirs and assigns, pay to the undersigned parties, or their representatives or assigns, the sum of nine thousand dollars ($9,000) less whatever sum has been paid as an option on said land, and such sum or sums as it might be necessary to withhold for the payment of unpaid taxes and outstanding incumbrances on said land. It is understood and agreed that the said sale is to be made at the option of the said George O. Gaylord or his heirs or assigns, to be exercised on or before the said 3d day of November, 1909. And it is further understood and agreed that if the said George O. Gaylord and his heirs and assigns shall not demand of the undersigned parties the deed herein provided for, and tender payment as herein provided for, on or before the 3d day of November, 1909, then this agreement to be null and void, and the undersigned parties are to be at liberty to dispose of the land to any other person or to use it as the undersigned parties may desire, in the same manner as if this contract had never been made; but otherwise this contract to remain in full force and effect. And it is furthermore understood and agreed that no timber is to be cut or removed from said land during the continuance of the option. The said Mrs. M. E. McCoy, C. L. McCoy and wife, Charles F. McCoy and wife, covenant with the said George O. Gaylord, his heirs and assigns, that they are seised of the above-described premises in fee, and have the right to convey the same in fee simple, and that they will warrant said title to be free from defects and that the said title is hereby warranted to be free from defects. It is understood that should George O. Gaylord decide to purchase said tract of land that from the same what is known as the L. C. McCoy graveyard is to be excepted, the said graveyard being near Mill creek and on the Wilmington and Fayetteville road, containing one-half acre, more or less, and what is inclosed by an iron fence; also is excepted what is known as the Samuel Rowell graveyard, containing one-half acre, more or less, and on the edge of the right of way of the Carolina Central Railroad. And to the true and faithful performance of this agreement we do hereby bind ourselves and heirs, executors, administrators and assigns to the said George O. Gaylord and his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns."

On October 20, 1909, the plaintiff notified the defendants that he had decided to purchase the lands described in said option, and that he demanded a deed in accordance with its terms.

On October 29, 1909, the defendants, through their attorney, prepared a deed which they tendered to the plaintiff, in which said deed there was omitted the following descriptive words which were in said option: "And is all of the land owned by Mrs. M. E. McCoy, C. L. McCoy and wife, Charles F. McCoy and wife, and F. M. McCoy and wife, in the county of Brunswick, state of North Carolina"--and, at the time of tendering said deed, the defendants, through their attorney, wrote a letter to the plaintiff in which they said, among other things, that they tendered the deed in compliance with the terms of the option and demanded the balance due on the purchase price; that they would not settle the creditors' suit brought against the plaintiff, F. M. McCoy and others, as they did not have to do so in order to give a good title, and that in their opinion the paper writing did not cover the 60 acres of land spoken of as the Anders place; and that they would not give a deed for the 60 acres that would cover the interest of F. M. McCoy, nor would they warrant the title to the 60 acres, and that F. M. McCoy would sign no deed covering his interest in the 60 acres.

On November 1, 1909, the plaintiff replied to said letter of October 29th, stating that the proposition submitted in the letter of October 29th was not in accordance with the terms of said option, and that the deed tendered did not contain the full description of the land, and making the following demands: "I demand a warranty deed from your clients for the said land above described, free from all incumbrances, as provided in said contract; and the bearer, Mr. Turner, will tender you the purchase price, and you may deliver the deed to him. I am advised by counsel that I am entitled under this contract to a title free from all incumbrances; also that the suit of J. A. Taylor and others is a judgment creditors' bill, which, if the suit is decided adversely to the McCoys, will be a charge or incumbrance upon at least one-third of the land, and is in the nature of a lis pendens; and also that there is another suit which may be decided adversely, which must be provided for. You will understand that I am insisting on all judgments, mortgages, and other liens being canceled; but I am entirely willing, if there are any pending suits which amount to a lis pendens, to pay the money and take a good bond from your client, protecting me in such suit, in the event they are decided adversely to your client."

Said letter of November 1, 1909, written by the plaintiff, was handed to the defendant's attorney by the attorney of the plaintiff, and at the same time the attorney of the plaintiff attempted to make a tender of the purchase money, and an account of what occurred at the time is stated by the defendant's attorney as follows: "On November 1st Mr. Turner brought me certified check for $8,600, and said 'I want to tender you, and want to know if you make the point that it is not cash?' I told him that F. M. McCoy was the only one who had spoken to me. I presumed I represented all of the defendants, but, if the others should say I was not authorized, I couldn't swear that I did represent them, 'and if, under the circumstances, you want me to waive it, I will do so.' He said, 'No, I will get the cash.' I said, 'Very well; comply with the law.' Turner came back about 1. p. m. with a shot bag in hand, and laid it on my table, with a letter written by George O. Gaylord, addressed to me, as attorney, dated November 1, 1909, and said he wanted to tender me $8,600, and wanted me to count the money. I read the letter and began counting. The first package contained $500 and was of paper currency, some five, some ten, and some twenty dollar bills. I counted the first package about four-fifths through, and turned to Turner and said: 'Mr. Turner, I want to call your attention to what you are offering me; here are some national bank notes, silver certificates, some treasury notes, some gold certificates. I don't have to take this.' I remember one national bank note was for...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT