Gearin v. State

Decision Date03 January 1973
Docket NumberNo. 2,No. 47556,47556,2
PartiesPhil GEARIN v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Glenn Zell, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joel M. Feldman, J. Melvin England, Darryl B. Cohen, Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

PANNELL, Judge.

Phil Gearin was convicted of burglary and carrying a pistol without a license outside his house, and outside his house concealed, and was sentenced to eleven years in the penitentiary. He appeals from an order overruling his amended motion for new trial. Held:

1. Appellant alleges 'The court erred in failing to charge the lesser included offense or included offense of receiving stolen goods as it was demanded by the evidence.'

The allegation presents two questions for the courts' consideration, (1) Is receiving stolen goods a lesser included offense of the offense of burglary? The general rule concerning lesser included offenses appears to be 'To warrant conviction of a lesser offense on an indictment or information charging a greater offense, it is essential that the allegations describing the greater offense contain all essential averments relating to the lesser offense or that the greater offense necessarily include all the essential ingredients of the lesser.' 42 C.J.S. Indictments and Informations § 275.

In Gilbert v. State, 65 Ga. 449, 450, the Supreme Court of Georgia Held that receiving stolen goods knowing them to be stolen is 'an offense wholly dissimilar from burglary in its nature and characteristics. One is accomplished by the presence and use of active force in the breaking and entering, whilst in the other is an utter absence of every element of burglary, as well as a transaction totally distant in time, place, circumstances, grade and punishment; one a felony, the other a misdemeanor.'

Under the Criminal Code of Georgia, Section 26-1806, theft by receiving stolen property (a misdemeanor) requires a receiving, disposing or retaining of stolen property which the accused knows or should know was stolen (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1292; 1969, pp. 857, 859) while the offense of burglary (Criminal Code § 26-1601) requires an entering or remaining in a building without authority with intent to commit a felony or theft therein. Nowhere is there an allegation of receiving, disposing or retaining of stolen property.

Phrased in other terms, it is clear that the offense of theft by receiving stolen property contains elements not present in the offense of burglary. Only an intent to commit theft is required-not the completed act.

That receiving carries a possible lower minimum sentence is irrelevant. Plummer v. State, 126 Ga.App. 482, 483, 191 S.E.2d 333.

2 Was the issue of receiving stolen property properly raised by the evidence to require the trial judge to instruct on the issue of lesser included offense? Assuming arguendo that receiving stolen property is lesser included in the offense of burglary, this point was raised only by defendant's unsworn statement at trial. He neither offered nor elicited any evidence, direct or circumstantial, in corroboration. There was no request to charge and the court had no duty to do so. Darby v. State, 79 Ga. 63(2), 3 S.E. 663; Hayden v. State, 69 Ga. 731(3); Burgess v. State, 210 Ga. 91, 78 S.E.2d 33; wilson v. State, 124 Ga.App. 403, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • McCorquodale v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1974
    ...by the court affirmatively stated that his only objection related to the charge on voluntary manslaughter. See Gearin v. State, 127 Ga.App. 811, 813, 195 S.E.2d 211 and Thompkins v. State, 126 Ga.App. 683, 684, 191 S.E.2d We also note that there was ample evidence to support the conviction ......
  • Childers v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 9, 1974
    ...'When a party accedes to an instruction by specifically stating no objection, he cannot now complain. (Cits.)' Gearin v. State, 127 Ga.App. 811, 813, 195 S.E.2d 211, 213. 6. The next two enumerations of error deal with circumstances involving a settlement offer. The owner of the stolen catt......
  • Williams v. State, 54486
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 1977
    ...injury to the same person . . . (and involves) a lesser kind of culpability . . . " if other requisites are present. In Gearin v. State, 127 Ga.App. 811, 195 S.E.2d 211, this court held that "(t)he general rule concerning lesser included offenses appears to be: 'To warrant conviction of a l......
  • Dalton v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1982
    ...commission. See Code Ann. § 26-505 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1267); Tuggle v. State, 145 Ga.App. 603(1), 244 S.E.2d 131; Gearin v. State, 127 Ga.App. 811(1), 195 S.E.2d 211; Allen v. State, 233 Ga. 200, 203(3), 210 S.E.2d 680; Krist v. State, 227 Ga. 85, 89, 179 S.E.2d 56; State v. Estevez, 232......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT