Gee v. State, 55898

Decision Date03 July 1978
Docket NumberNo. 55898,55898
Citation146 Ga.App. 528,246 S.E.2d 720
PartiesGEE et al. v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Loggins & Murray, Hulon Murray, Gainesville, for appellants.

Jeff C. Wayne, Dist. Atty., James H. Whitmer, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

McMURRAY, Judge.

Defendants were indicted for and convicted of the offense of motor vehicle theft. Defendants appeal, contending that the circumstantial evidence presented by the state is not sufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court erred in the charge on flight. Held:

1. "To warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts shall not only be consistent with guilt but shall exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of guilt of the accused. Code § 38-109. Such evidence need not exclude Every inference or hypothesis except guilt of an accused, but only Reasonable inferences and hypotheses, so as to justify the inference, beyond a reasonable doubt, of guilt. Rogers v. State, 139 Ga.App. 656, 659, 229 S.E.2d 132. 'Questions as to reasonableness are generally to be decided by the jury which heard the evidence and where the jury is authorized to find the evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of guilt, the appellate court will not disturb that finding, unless the verdict of guilty is unsupportable as a matter of law.' Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 245, 223 S.E.2d 643." Parker v. State, 142 Ga.App. 396, 397, 236 S.E.2d 141, 142.

Here, the state has shown that defendants were at Clark's home on the Saturday night that Clark's pickup truck was stolen. The following day defendant Gee was recognized as the passenger in defendant Davis' automobile at the deserted location where tires from the stolen truck were found lying beside the road. Soon thereafter Davis' automobile was found parked and locked. Examination of defendant Davis' automobile revealed a citizens' band antenna taken from the truck. Also found in defendant Davis' car were pieces of tallow such as found on the tires and on the truck due to Clark's work in and around rendering plants. Both defendants admitted to an officer they were together for a considerable period of time during that weekend, finally going to Florida. The state's evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.

2. Defendants contend that the charge on flight was erroneous in that the charge included prohibited expressions of opinion by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Watkins v. Mortgage
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of West Virginia
    • 28 Febrero 2011
    ... ... Defendant moves to have Plaintiff's Amended Complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of ... ...
  • Cook v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 19 Enero 1988
    ...or reasonableness of these representations is not for us to decide (see Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 223 S.E.2d 643; Gee v. State, 146 Ga.App. 528, 246 S.E.2d 720; Townsend v. State, 127 Ga.App. 797, 799, 195 S.E.2d 474); but suffice it to say the jury might have believed appellant's posse......
  • Fredericks v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 16 Septiembre 1985
    ...unless the verdict of guilty is unsupportable as a matter of law." Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 245 (223 SE2d 643).' Gee v. State, 146 Ga.App. 528 (246 SE2d 720) (1978)." Lewis v. State, 149 Ga.App. 181(1), 182, 254 S.E.2d In the case sub judice, the jury rejected the defendant's explanati......
  • C.A.A., In Interest of, 76399
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 30 Junio 1988
    ...guilt is circumstantial. Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 223 S.E.2d 643; Lewis v. State, 149 Ga.App. 181, 254 S.E.2d 142; Gee v. State, 146 Ga.App. 528, 246 S.E.2d 720; Pless v. State, 142 Ga.App. 594, 236 S.E.2d 842; Townsend v. State, 127 Ga.App. 797, 799, 195 S.E.2d 474. In this case the f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT