Gee v. State, 55898
Decision Date | 03 July 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 55898,55898 |
Citation | 146 Ga.App. 528,246 S.E.2d 720 |
Parties | GEE et al. v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Loggins & Murray, Hulon Murray, Gainesville, for appellants.
Jeff C. Wayne, Dist. Atty., James H. Whitmer, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Defendants were indicted for and convicted of the offense of motor vehicle theft. Defendants appeal, contending that the circumstantial evidence presented by the state is not sufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court erred in the charge on flight. Held:
1. Parker v. State, 142 Ga.App. 396, 397, 236 S.E.2d 141, 142.
Here, the state has shown that defendants were at Clark's home on the Saturday night that Clark's pickup truck was stolen. The following day defendant Gee was recognized as the passenger in defendant Davis' automobile at the deserted location where tires from the stolen truck were found lying beside the road. Soon thereafter Davis' automobile was found parked and locked. Examination of defendant Davis' automobile revealed a citizens' band antenna taken from the truck. Also found in defendant Davis' car were pieces of tallow such as found on the tires and on the truck due to Clark's work in and around rendering plants. Both defendants admitted to an officer they were together for a considerable period of time during that weekend, finally going to Florida. The state's evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.
2. Defendants contend that the charge on flight was erroneous in that the charge included prohibited expressions of opinion by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watkins v. Mortgage
... ... Defendant moves to have Plaintiff's Amended Complaint dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of ... ...
-
Cook v. State
...or reasonableness of these representations is not for us to decide (see Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 223 S.E.2d 643; Gee v. State, 146 Ga.App. 528, 246 S.E.2d 720; Townsend v. State, 127 Ga.App. 797, 799, 195 S.E.2d 474); but suffice it to say the jury might have believed appellant's posse......
-
Fredericks v. State
...unless the verdict of guilty is unsupportable as a matter of law." Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 245 (223 SE2d 643).' Gee v. State, 146 Ga.App. 528 (246 SE2d 720) (1978)." Lewis v. State, 149 Ga.App. 181(1), 182, 254 S.E.2d In the case sub judice, the jury rejected the defendant's explanati......
-
C.A.A., In Interest of, 76399
...guilt is circumstantial. Harris v. State, 236 Ga. 242, 223 S.E.2d 643; Lewis v. State, 149 Ga.App. 181, 254 S.E.2d 142; Gee v. State, 146 Ga.App. 528, 246 S.E.2d 720; Pless v. State, 142 Ga.App. 594, 236 S.E.2d 842; Townsend v. State, 127 Ga.App. 797, 799, 195 S.E.2d 474. In this case the f......