General Aluminum Corp. v. Arapahoe County Dist. Court

Decision Date15 April 1968
Docket NumberNo. 23351,23351
Citation165 Colo. 445,439 P.2d 340
PartiesGENERAL ALUMINUM CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. ARAPAHOE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, Defendant.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker & Grover, C. E. Eckerman, Denver, for plaintiff.

Reardon, Reardon & Reardon, Denver, for defendant.

PRINGLE, Justice.

This is an original proceeding brought by General Aluminum Corporation (hereinafter called plaintiff), seeking an order requiring the District Court of Arapahoe County to reinstate a default judgment in its favor which that court had vacated. We issued a rule to show cause.

The default judgment in question, in the amount of $30,070.11, was entered October 26, 1967, in an action brought by plaintiff against Kelley Builders Supply, Inc. and William C. Kelley, individually (hereinafter referred to as defendants). On November 17, 1967, the defendants moved to have the judgment set aside under R.C.P.Colo. 60(b). After hearing, the district court entered an order granting defendants' motion, on conditions that Kelley release two deeds of trust and a homestead entered on his property after institution of the suit against him.

Plaintiff brings this proceeding under R.C.P.Colo. 106(a)(4), alleging that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction and abused its discretion in entering the above order. Since the amendment of March 31, 1964 (effective January 12, 1965), Rule 106 applies only to relief sought in the district courts against inferior courts, administrative boards and officials. We shall therefore treat this proceeding as though properly brought under R.C.P.Colo. 116(a), as amended, which provides in pertinent part:

'* * * Relief in the nature of prohibition may be sought in the supreme court where the district court is proceeding without or in excess of its jurisdiction or where the district court has granted or denied change of venue in actions in rem or in actions where the statute prescribes the forum. When the action, threatened action, or refusal to act is solely within the discretion of the district court, prohibition or mandamus shall not be a remedy but the same may be a ground for writ of error after final judgment.' (Emphasis added).

An application to set aside a default judgment under R.C.P.Colo. 60(b) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court. White, Green & Addison Associates Inc. v. Monarch Oil & Uranium Corp., 141 Colo. 107, 347 P.2d 135; Riss v. Air...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Weaver Const. Co. v. District Court In and For El Paso County, 4th Judicial Dist., 27016
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • February 2, 1976
    ...aside judgments. Credit Inv. & Loan Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co., 166 Colo. 471, 444 P.2d 633 (1968); General Aluminum Corp. v. District Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968); Coerber v. Rath, supra; Riss v. Air Rental, Inc., 136 Colo. 216, 315 P.2d 820 (1957). We therefore hold tha......
  • Broyles v. Fort Lyon Canal Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1985
    ...matter. An order granting a motion to set aside an order or judgment is not itself a final judgment. General Aluminum Corp. v. District Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968); Westerkamp v. Westerkamp, 155 Colo. 534, 395 P.2d 737 (1964); Schtul v. Christ, 132 Colo. 293, 287 P.2d 661 (195......
  • Tyler v. Adams County Dept. of Social Services ex rel. Tyler
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1985
    ...neglect that justifies relief from a judgment is left to the discretion of the trial court. General Aluminum Corp. v. Arapahoe County District Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968); Johnson v. Johnson, 132 Colo. 236, 287 P.2d 49 (1955). The decision of the trial court will be upheld unl......
  • Snow v. District Court In and For City and County of Denver, Second Judicial Dist.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1977
    ...decision on whether to set aside an entry of default is left to the sound discretion of the trial court. See General Aluminum Corp. v. District Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340; Dudley v. Keller, 33 Colo.App. 320, 521 P.2d We can detect no abuse of discretion by the trial court in refusin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • THE COLORADO APPELLATE RULES
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Appellate Handbook (CBA) Appendices
    • Invalid date
    ...an application to set aside a default judgment is by appeal after final judgment. Gen. Aluminum Corp. v. Arapahoe County Dist. Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968). Additur to verdict. An order of the trial court granting additur to verdict of jury, or, if either party elected not to a......
  • Rule 55 DEFAULT.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure (CBA)
    • Invalid date
    ...Loan Co., 153 Colo. 261, 385 P.2d 421 (1963); Coerber v. Rath, 164 Colo. 294, 435 P.2d 228 (1967); Gen. Aluminum Corp. v. District Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968); Moskowitz v. Michaels Artists & Eng'r Supplies, Inc., 29 Colo. App. 44, 477 P.2d 465 (1970); Snow v. District Court, ......
  • Rule 1 SCOPE OF RULES.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure (CBA)
    • Invalid date
    ...an application to set aside a default judgment is by appeal after final judgment. Gen. Aluminum Corp. v. Arapahoe County Dist. Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968). Additur to verdict. An order of the trial court granting additur to verdict of jury, or, if either party elected not to a......
  • Rule 106 FORMS OF WRITS ABOLISHED.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure (CBA)
    • Invalid date
    ...in the district courts against inferior courts, administrative boards, and officials. Gen. Aluminum Corp. v. Arapahoe County Dist. Court, 165 Colo. 445, 439 P.2d 340 (1968). It does not apply to original proceedings. Lucas v. District Court, 140 Colo. 510, 345 P.2d 1064 (1959). This rule do......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT