General American Life Ins. Co. v. Anderson
Decision Date | 10 July 1942 |
Docket Number | No. E-694.,E-694. |
Citation | 46 F. Supp. 189 |
Parties | GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INS. CO. v. ANDERSON. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky |
William Marshall Bullitt, Leo T. Wolford, Francis T. Goheen, and Thomas W. Bullitt, all of Louisville, Ky., and Allen May and Powell B. McHaney, both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Frank E. Wood, Robert S. Marx, Milton H. Schmidt, and Harry Kasfir (of Nichols, Wood, Marx & Ginter), all of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.
The whole determination of this case rests upon the activities of one Rogers Caldwell, an investment and securities broker of Nashville, Tennessee. This man's life and activities in the financial world in the 1920's reads like a romance. He organized Caldwell & Company, a brokerage and investment company. He dominated and controlled this company. He organized The Bank of Tennessee, which was used as a part of his complex financial structure. He became recognized as a multi-millionaire financial wizard. The period of time in which he operated was one of great credit inflation and gave him a natural setting for his daring speculations and desires to grasp financial power and prestige. He acquired the identity of "the J. P. Morgan of the South", and his genius for gaining confidences and his play upon less gifted men's minds was unlimited. His appetite for power was insatiable. The manifestation of his genius and the ultimate end to which it came are best described in the words of Judge Simons of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in the opinion reversing a former ruling of this court in this case.
A. M. Anderson, Receiver, etc., v. Missouri State Life Insurance Co., 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 794, 796.
Through the agencies and connections referred to large stock ownership was acquired by the Caldwell companies in the Missouri State Life Insurance Company. This was one of the largest insurance companies in the United States. Among the stock companies it was surpassed in size by only the Travelers and the Aetna, and was eighteenth in size of all life insurance companies in this country. It did business in forty-two states, employed about seven hundred persons and had investment departments in many of the large cities in America.
Its size and importance are reflected in the following table:
Capital and Admitted Surplus Assets Income 1925 $4,000,000 $62,000,000 $21,000,000 1926 $5,000,000 $70,000,000 $23,000,000 1927 $6,000,000 $80,000,000 $25,000,000 1928 $7,000,000 $131,000,000 $72,000,000 1929 $7,000,000 $143,000,000 $41,000,000 1930 $7,000,000 $151,000,000 $40,000,000 Disbursements Insurance Number of in Force Policies 1925 $13,000,000 $587,000,000 197,000 1926 $14,000,000 $600,000,000 200,000 1927 $17,000,000 $750,000,000 222,000 1928 $23,000,000 $1,000,000,000 364,000 1929 $30,000,000 $1,200,000,000 371,000 1930 $32,000,000 $1,250,000,000 371,000
Its directors at the time of the transactions here involved and for preceding years were business men of high standing, many of them connected with large and successful financial and business institutions entirely unrelated to any of the Caldwell interests. It had something like 4,000 stockholders. At the time of the transactions involved in this case the Caldwell interests owned about 30% of the capital stock and exercised the most powerful influence over the board of directors and all agencies of the company and its enterprises. The president of the Missouri State Life at this time was Hillsman Taylor, from Tennessee, a protege of the Caldwells and largely dominated in his decisions and conduct of the affairs of the company by Rogers Caldwell, and his father, James E. Caldwell, who was also a member of the board of directors.
The directors named an Executive Committee from the members of its board with broad delegated powers to pass upon securities in which it invested. This committee was composed of Rogers Caldwell, James E. Caldwell, Hillsman Taylor and others more independent of Caldwell, but who rather generally accepted the judgment of the Caldwell group on investment of the funds of the company. Large blocks of securities were purchased from Caldwell & Company. It is also shown that investments were made through other firms to an even greater extent than through Caldwell & Company.
To sum up the evidence contained in hundreds of pages of transcript it is established that at the time of the transactions involved in this action Rogers Caldwell was the most dominant personality in the Missouri State Life organization and exercised influence to such an extent that the company submitted to his guidance and direction in its investment branch to a dangerous degree. The record, however, contains ample evidence that the board did not on all occasions comply with his will.
The immediate transaction with which we are concerned is the purchase of two certificates of deposit for $250,000 each, executed on August 21, 1930, by The National Bank of Kentucky, at Louisville, Kentucky.
The standing and financial solidity of The National Bank of Kentucky are too well known and too frequently discussed in opinion from this court and others to be reviewed here. See Anderson v. Abbott et al., D.C., 32 F.Supp. 328; Atherton v. Anderson, 6 Cir., 86 F.2d 518; Anderson v. Abbott, 6 Cir., 127 F.2d 696.
As is pointed out in these authorities, it was considered an impregnable fortress of security and conservative banking. Its end as such an institution came about through the wild speculation, carelessness and corruption of some of its officers and the laxness and negligence of its board of directors. Atherton et al. v. Anderson, 6 Cir., 99 F.2d 883.
Rogers Caldwell controlled an insurance stockholding company known as The Associated Life Company. Through contact with James B. Brown, Executive President of The National Bank of Kentucky, and Charles F. Jones, its Vice-President, he borrowed from the bank for the Associated Life Company the sum of $500,000. These negotiations were had not at the bank, but at the home of James B. Brown, in Louisville. The loan was secured by collateral and a note duly executed to the bank by the Associated Life Company. The Associated Life then gave its check to the bank for the amount of the loan and the bank issued to Caldwell & Company the two certificates of deposit on which were reissued the certificates in suit. Simultaneously Caldwell & Company delivered to the bank a letter from Associated Life stating that it had purchased the certificates from the proceeds of the loan in the name of Caldwell & Company and in the letter incorporated this statement and obligation: "We hereby agree and guarantee that the certificates of deposit will not be cashed only in reduction of the above mentioned loan."
On August 27, 1930, six days after the certificates were issued, in violation of the agreement, Caldwell & Company sold and the Missouri State Life purchased one of the certificates for $250,000, its face value, and on the same day a letter was sent by the Missouri State Life to the bank calling attention to a bylaw of the company that all securities must stand in the name of the company and asking that the certificate be reissued in the name of the Missouri State Life. This letter is in words and figures as follows:
The bank did not immediately acknowledge the receipt of this letter but held the certificate until a second conference was had on the night of September 4, at the home of James B. Brown wi...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. General American Life Ins. Co.
...plaintiff herein. The opinion of District Judge Swinford, who tried the case upon its remand, is reported in General American Life Ins. Co. v. Anderson, D.C., 46 F.Supp. 189-198. On the former hearing of the case, no error was found in the conclusion of District Judge Cochran that the knowl......
-
General American Life Ins. Co. v. Anderson
...Co. v. Keyes, D.C.W.D.Ky., 46 F.Supp. 181; Anderson v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 794; General American Life Insurance Co. v. Anderson, D.C.W.D.Ky., 46 F.Supp. 189; Anderson v. General American Life Insurance Co., 6 Cir., 141 F.2d 898; and the judgment from which appeal i......
-
United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. State of Oklahoma, 9201.
...Co. v. Tulsa Industrial Loan and Investment Co., 83 F.2d 14, 105 A.L.R. 529 (10th Cir. 1936). See General American Life Insurance Co. v. Anderson, 46 F.Supp. 189 (W.D.Ky.1942). Of equal inapplicability is the bonding company's argument that the bank cannot seek to enforce a contract procure......
-
Olympic Capital Corporation v. Newman
...of an individual to reach corporate assets. Agency in terms of what may be called the "sole actor doctrine," General American Life Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 46 F.Supp. 189 modified 141 F.2d 898 cert. denied 323 U.S. 798, 65 S.Ct. 554, 89 L.Ed. 637, is not pleaded herein and it is most doubtful ......