Geneva Wagon Co. v. Smith

Decision Date18 May 1905
Citation74 N.E. 299,188 Mass. 202
PartiesGENEVA WAGON CO. v. SMITH.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

Chas. T. Cottrell, for plaintiff.

Thorndike Spalding, for defendant.

OPINION

HAMMOND, J.

The evidence warranted a finding that the title to the wagons was to remain the plaintiff until paid for in money, and that they never were so paid for; and therefore that the title never passed to the Hendersons. Upon the uncontradicted evidence, the wagons were included in the mortgage. The language of the mortgage included them, and Henderson, both as mortgagor and as agent for the defendant, the mortgagee, intended that they should be included. After the mortgage, Henderson had the key to the building in which the wagons were kept, and the court could properly find upon the evidence that he acted as agent for the defendant, so far as respected her supposed rights as mortgagee, and kept them for her under a claim of right inconsistent with the rights of the plaintiff. This was a tortious act on the part of the defendant, and no demand was necessary before bringing the suit. Baker v. Lothrop, 155 Mass. 376, 29 N.E. 643, and cases cited. We see no error in the rulings given by the court.

Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Lawyers' Mortg. Inv. Corp. of Boston v. Paramount Laundries, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1934
    ...125 Mass. 576;Wood v. McDonald, 66 Cal. 546, 6 P. 452. See, also, Robinson v. Way, 163 Mass. 212, 39 N. E. 1009;Geneva Wagon Co. v. Smith, 188 Mass. 202, 74 N. E. 299;O'Brien v. McSherry, 222 Mass. 147, 109 N. E. 904. ‘Demand and refusal are never necessary, except as furnishing evidence of......
  • Roland M. Baker Co. v. Brown
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • February 27, 1913
    ... ... which must determine the result of their action. Alcock ... v. Smith, [1892] 1 Ch. 238, 255, 263, 266, 269. The same ... rule is applied to the transfer of foreign ... the action. Hunt v. Boston, 183 Mass. 303, 67 N.E ... 244; Geneva Wagon Co. v. Smith, 188 Mass. 202, 74 ... N.E. 299 ...          Nor can ... the ... ...
  • Lawyers Mortgage Investment Corp. of Boston v. Paramount Laundries Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1934
    ... ... 576 ... Wood v. McDonald, 66 Cal. 546. See also Robinson ... v. Way, 163 Mass. 212; Geneva Wagon Co. v ... Smith, 188 Mass. 202; O'Brien v. McSherry, ... 222 Mass. 147 ... "Demand and ... ...
  • LeHan v. North Main St. Garage, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 28, 1942
    ...The purchase by the defendant was the conversion complained of. See Stanley v. Gaylord, 1 Cush. 536,48 Am.Dec. 643;Geneva Wagon Co. v. Smith, 188 Mass. 202, 74 N.E. 299;Sallinger v. Collateral Loan Co., 215 Mass. 266, 102 N.E. 365;Lynn Morris Plan Co. v. Gordon, 251 Mass. 323, 146 N.E. 685;......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT