Gentry v. Robinson

Decision Date31 January 1874
Citation55 Mo. 260
PartiesWM. T. GENTRY, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. MARY E. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants in Error.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Error to the Common Pleas Court, of Lafayette County.

Wallace & Mitchell, for Plaintiffs in Error.

ADAMS, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action in the nature of a bill in chancery, to set aside a conveyance of certain lands in or near Waverly, in Lafayette County, made to the defendant, Mary E. Robinson, and one Sarah E. Wilhite. The object of the action was to set the conveyance aside, so far as Mary E. Robinson was interested, that is, as to one undivided half of the lands. The leading facts, as established by the admissions in the pleadings and the evidence, are, that the defendant, Wm. F.Robinson, at and before the time of the conveyance to his wife, Mary E. Robinson, was largely indebted and in insolvent circumstances: that he had no means whatever to invest in lands. He however, together with Wilhite, contracted with the defendant, Sternitzky, for the purchase of the lands, and, as they had no money to pay for the lands, they applied to David Hinton, and he would not loan the money without personal security. The defendants, Oscar Miles and Olcott Bulkley, agreed to be their security, provided a deed of trust was given on the lands to save them harmless from the payment of the note to be given for the purchase money. The loan was made on these terms, and the money was invested in the lands in dispute, and a deed taken therefor to the wives of Robinson and Wilhite, who, about a year afterwards, in pursuance of the original understanding, joined with their husbands in executing the deed of trust in favor of Miles & Bulkley. This deed of trust was executed to the Sheriff of Lafayette county, as Trustee, for the purpose of saving Miles & Bulkley harmless as security on the note given for the money to buy the lands. When the note matured, Hinton brought suit and obtained judgment on it against Miles & Bulkley, and their lands were levied on to pay the judgment, and each of them paid their share of the whole judgment, amounting to over three thousand dollars ($3,000). Afterwards they ordered a sale under the deed of trust, and the acting Sheriff of Lafayette county foreclosed the deed of trust and sold the lands, and Miles & Bulkley became the purchasers at $3000.00, and the Sheriff, as trustee, executed to them a deed for the lands. In the mean time, and just before the purchase and conveyance to the wives of Robinson and Wilhite, Woods, Christy & Co., to whom Robinson was indebted, brought suit on a note which they held on him, and afterwards obtained a judgment. After this judgment was obtained, the deed of trust referred to was made to the Sheriff to secure Miles & Bulkley as above stated. Afterwards, the lands in dispute were sold at execution sale under the judgment of Woods, Christy & Co., and the plaintiffs bought them...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Clark v. Lewis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1908
    ...the creditor in the execution and is clothed with all of his remedies against all of the fraudulent contrivances of the debtor. Gentry v. Robinson, 55 Mo. 260; v. Baker, 14 Mo.App. 353, 88 Mo. 454. Fordyce, Holliday & White for defendants in error; C. M. Polk of counsel. The deed to Mrs. Mi......
  • Purse v. Estes
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1901
    ... ... The ... plaintiff in the judgment had no such right thereafter ... Knoop v. Kelsey, 121 Mo. 642; Huffman v ... Nixon, 152 Mo. 303; Gentry v. Robinson, 55 Mo ... 260. (2) In attempting to set aside a deed of a purchaser, at ... a judicial sale, or at a sale by a trustee, the burden of ... ...
  • Knoop v. Kelsey
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1890
    ... ... rights of the plaintiff in the executions, and he alone can ... set up the invalidity of the deed of trust. Gentry v ... Robinson, 55 Mo. 260; Eastman v. Schettler, 13 ... Wis. 362; Freeland v. Freeland, 102 Mass. 475; ... Dwinell v. Purley, 32 Maine, 197; ... ...
  • Pugh v. Hayes
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • January 23, 1893
    ... ... Ranken ... v. Harper, 23 Mo. 579; Bobb v. Woodward, 50 Mo ... 95; Lionberger v. Baker, 88 Mo. 447; Gentry v ... Robinson, 55 Mo. 260; Morgan v. Bouse, 53 Mo ... 219. (10) Property held in trust is liable for the debts of ... the cestui que trust ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT