George Hunt, Inc. v. Dorsey Young Const., Inc., 79-469
| Citation | 385 So.2d 732 |
| Decision Date | 09 July 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-469,79-469 |
| Parties | GEORGE HUNT, INC., et al., Appellant/Cross Appellee/Third Party Defendant, v. DORSEY YOUNG CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee/Cross Appellant/Plaintiff. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Michael G. Widoff, of Michael G. Widoff, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross appellee/third party defendant.
No appearance for appellee/cross appellant/plaintiff.
Appellant, Hunt, for purposes of this litigation is in the position of General Contractor for the construction of a two building shopping center. Appellee, as a subcontractor, was to supply concrete slabs, foundations, concrete block and masonry work for the project. Upon completion of its contract appellee was unable to obtain final payment and filed suit, whereupon a jury returned a verdict awarding appellee damages in the amount of $12,500.
Appellant's defenses were that the work was faulty and inadequate and that appellee refused to certify that its suppliers and laborers had been paid.
During the trial appellee was permitted to introduce testimony to the effect that (1) the reason for non-payment was that the General Contractor was short of funds; (2) an agent of the General Contractor agreed that $20,000 was owed to appellee; and (3) the design of certain aspects of the building rather than appellee's workmanship caused leaking and attendant problems. In each instance the testimony was hearsay, unsupported by any other competent evidence in the record and, inasmuch as these statements go to the very heart of appellant's defenses it cannot be said that admission of this testimony constituted harmless error. On the contrary, it seems most reasonable to suppose that the jury gave at least some, and perhaps considerable, credence to the theories supported by this hearsay evidence.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial on that basis.
The cross appeal has been abandoned and is hereby dismissed, sua sponte.
Because the matter may be retried, we will comment briefly on two additional matters disclosed by our examination of the record in order to forestall repetition of what we perceive to be potentially harmful errors.
Appellant complains of appellee's failure to provide the customary affidavit and general release as a condition precedent to final payment. The trial court's refusal to give an instruction in this regard is urged as reversible error. Obviously, appellee would not be entitled to collect...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Air Caledonie Intern. v. Aar Parts Trading, Inc.
...verdict. See Tolin Mfg. Corp. v. Roy Feiner Handbags, Inc., 173 So.2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). See also George Hunt v. Dorsey Young Construction, Inc., 385 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (citing Hodges v. Fries, 34 Fla. 63, 15 So. 682 (Fla.1894)) ("Evidence as to the amount of damages cannot ......
-
Sundale Associates, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank, N.A.
...See Stambor v. One Hundred Seventy-Second Collins Corp., 465 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); George Hunt, Inc. v. Dorsey Young Construction, Inc., 385 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). 3. Our requirement of a new trial on the counterclaim moots, at least for the present, Sundale's primary conte......
-
Touch-N-Buy, Ltd. v. Girocheck Fin., Inc.
...profits. See Tolin Mfg. Corp. v. Roy Feiner Handbargs, Inc., 173 SO.2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). See also George Hunt v. Dorsey Young Construction, Inc., 385 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)(citing Hodges v. Fries, 34 Fla. 63, 15 So. 682 (Fla. 1894)("Evidence as to the amount of damages cannot b......
-
Gonzalez v. Barrenechea
...that the evidence affords a sufficient basis for estimating an amount in money with reasonable certainty.”); Hunt v. Dorsey Young Const., 385 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (“Evidence as to amount of damages cannot be based on speculation or conjecture, but must be proven with certainty.”); ......