Georgetown Mercantile Co. v. Steen

• Decision Date: 16 December 1929
• Docket Number: 28250
• Citation: 125 So. 120,155 Miss. 719
• Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
• Parties: GEORGETOWN MERCANTILE CO. v. STEEN et al

125 So. 120

155 Miss. 719

GEORGETOWN MERCANTILE CO. v. STEEN et al

No. 28250

Supreme Court of Mississippi

December 16, 1929

Division A

1 TRIAL. Instruction, unless jury could say from evidence whether or not note was paid, they should find for defendant held erroneous.

In action on note in which defendant claimed payment instruction that, if jury could not say from evidence whether or not note had been paid, they should find for defendant, held erroneous, since it put plaintiff to burden of proving that defendant had not paid note

2. BILLS AND NOTES. Payment of note is affirmative defense, and burden is on him who pleads it.

Payment of note is an affirmative defense, and burden is on him who pleads it, since he who asserts the affirmative must prove it.

HON. W. L. CRANFORD, Judge.

APPEAL from circuit court of Simpson county HON. W. L. CRANFORD, Judge.

Suit commenced in a court of a justice of the peace by the Georgetown Mercantile Company against C. L. and M. C. Steen. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Case reversed and remanded.

Hilton & Hilton, of Mendenhall, for appellant.

The burden of establishing a plea of payment is on the defendant, since such plea is an affirmative one.

Greenburg v. Sauls Bros. & Co., 91 Miss. 410; 2 Joyce on Defenses to Commercial Paper, p. 1314.

J. P. and A. K. Edwards, of Mendenhall, for appellee.

The burden of proving payment, is on the appellees here, and this burden was met, and met independently of the doctrine of the application of the payments, but when all the evidence in the case is considered, it is manifest there is no reversible error in the record and that the jury reached the correct verdict.

OPINION

McGowen, J.

This action was founded on a note, the suit originating in a court of a justice of the peace, appealed to the circuit court, and from an adverse verdict and judgment against the plaintiff, the appellant, appeal is prosecuted here.

The execution of the note was admitted, and the only issue raised was appellee's plea of payment. On this issue the evidence was sufficient to go to the jury.

As this case must be sent back for another trial, we pretermit a statement of the facts; and of the several instructions refused or granted, complained of as error, we shall consider only one.

For the appellee, defendant in the court below, the court gave the following instruction: "The court instructs the jury for defendant that if you cannot say from the evidence in this case whether or not...