Georgia Bureau of Investigation v. Worthington, 57378

Decision Date13 April 1979
Docket NumberNo. 57378,57378
PartiesGEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al. v. WORTHINGTON.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Gary R. Hurst, G. Thomas Davis, Atlanta, for appellants.

James I. Parker, Cedartown, for appellee.

UNDERWOOD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Polk County affirming an award of compensation to Worthington by the State Board of Workers' Compensation.

The record shows that Worthington, age 53 at the time of the incident in question, was an employee of the Georgia Crime Information Center, a division of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and he had primary responsibility for the collection and submission of statistical data on crime in his fourteen county district. Shortly after leaving his home in Cedartown on July 14, 1976, enroute to his employment-related appointment at a firing range in Atlanta, he stopped at a restaurant for coffee and while there experienced a dizzy spell. With some assistance, he left the restaurant and drove to the offices of a doctor in Cedartown, and later in the day, drove to his office in Atlanta where he experienced blurred vision, a headache, and impairment of speech and movement.

Three doctors testified in this proceeding, and all agreed that Worthington is totally incapacitated to perform the duties of his job. It is Worthington's contention that the medical incident which occurred on July 14, 1976, was caused by the stress and tension of the duties of his job. There was a variance in the diagnosis reached concerning the claimant's medical condition. After the administrative law judge denied benefits, the board made the following findings of fact: "The stress of claimant's work did contribute to the incident of July 14, 1976 and to his current disability. The Board bases this finding on Dr. Campbell's testimony that the stress of claimant's work was sufficient to precipitate an episode of symptoms such as he suffered on July 14, 1976. Dr. Seavey is not a cardiologist but is a specialist in internal medicine. His testimony is entitled to no more weight than that of Dr. Campbell, claimant's regular treating physician."

The GBI contends that because Dr. Campbell, who had treated Worthington on a regular basis prior to the incident in question, referred the claimant to Dr. Seavey, a specialist in internal medicine, who gave testimony unfavorable to the claimant's contentions, then Dr....

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Reynolds Const. Co. v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 14, 1995
    ...has been applied in cases where the claimant contended that mental stress alone caused a stroke. In Ga. Bureau of Investigation v. Worthington, 149 Ga.App. 628, 255 S.E.2d 99 (1979), the claimant contended that job-related stress and tension caused his injury. See Williams v. ARA Environmen......
  • Simon v. Morehouse School of Medicine
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • September 6, 1995
    ...Omaha Ins. Co., 484 F.Supp. 693 (N.D.Ga. 1979), aff'd without opinion, 616 F.2d 565 (5th Cir.1980); Georgia Bureau of Investigation v. Worthington, 149 Ga.App. 628, 255 S.E.2d 99 (1979). While this Court agrees with Morehouse that the rape by Harris, and Braithwaite's and Harris' other sexu......
  • Williams v. ARA Environmental Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 10, 1985
    ...Hanson Buick, supra; Brady v. Royal Mfg. Co., 117 Ga.App. 312, 160 S.E.2d 424 (1968). The ruling in Ga. Bureau of Investigation v. Worthington, 149 Ga.App. 628, 255 S.E.2d 99 (1979), upon which appellant relies, does not require a different result in the case now before us. In Worthington, ......
  • Burbank v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., Civ. A. No. C77-1780A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • October 30, 1979
    ...blood pressure, developed emotional instability, and . . . anxiety neurosis." Complaint, at ¶ 9. In Georgia Bureau of Investigation v. Worthington, 149 Ga. App. 628, 255 S.E.2d 99 (1979), the court allowed recovery for similar injuries: blurred vision, headache, and impairment of speech and......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT