Georgia Ed. Authority (Schools) v. Davis, s. 26173
| Decision Date | 03 December 1970 |
| Docket Number | 26176,Nos. 26173,s. 26173 |
| Citation | 227 Ga. 36,178 S.E.2d 853 |
| Parties | GEORGIA EDUCATION AUTHORITY (SCHOOLS) et al. v. Isaac J. DAVIS et al. Isaac J. DAVIS et al. v. GEORGIA EDUCATION AUTHORITY (SCHOOLS) et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., William L. Harper, H. Perry Michael, Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, for appellants.
Albert E. Butler, Jesup, S. F. Memory, Jr., M. C. Pritchard, Waycross, for appellees.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
This is an action by citizens and taxpayers of Ware County against the Georgia Education Authority (Schools), the Ware County Board of Education, and others. It seeks to enjoin the Authority from commencing the construction of a certain senior high school building in Ware County, from using certain funds for such construction, and from recording any deed to the land upon which the school is to be located. It seeks to enjoin the county board of education from the establishment of a senior high school at such location, from receiving any of said funds, and from pledging any of its land to said Authority. The petition alleges that the defendant Authority is threatening to construct a school with capital outlay funds in the amount of $732,000 on land owned by the county board of education; that said land is not embraced within the cost of construction and has not been leased nor sold at a reasonable value to the defendant Authority; that construction of the school will result in a misuse of said trust funds; that the expenditure of said capital outlay funds was conditioned upon the ability of the defendant county board of education to furnish local capital funds from its unused bonding capacity which condition has not been fulfilled; that the county board of education is seeking to act in excess of its authority since there are no local matching funds nor legal sources of funds available for such project; that the county board of education cannot legally pledge its property for the project as proposed; and that the defendant Authority and the defendant board of education are acting ultra vires and are attempting to construct a school contrary to law.
The defendant Authority filed a counterclaim for damages and costs incurred by plaintiffs' malicious and frivolous attempts to delay the construction of said school by repeated litigation. It prayed also that the plaintiffs, Robert Peagler, and others, be enjoined from bringing any complaint or taking any other action interfering with the construction of said school. The counterclaim alleges that Robert Peagler, a resident and citizen of Ware County, intervened in the bond validation proceedings for said school construction project in 1967 and that said validation was approved in the lower court and affirmed on appeal (Peagler v. State of Ga., 117 Ga.App. 821, 162 S.E.2d 11); that subsequently the bonds were sold to innocent purchasers for value; that thereafter said Robert Peagler and others filed another suit in Fulton County seeking to enjoin the defendant Authority from constructing said school; that this decision was adverse to the plaintiffs and affirmed on appeal (Cox v. Ga. Education Authority, 225 Ga. 542, 170 S.E.2d 240); that thereafter the plaintiffs brought a suit in Ware County to enjoin said school construction; that this action was dismissed on a plea to the jurisdiction and an appeal therefrom is now pending in this court (Davis v. Ware County Board of Education, No. 26154, 227 Ga. 41, 178 S.E.2d 857); that thereafter the instant suit was filed in Fulton County; that the plaintiffs in this action are acting in conjunction with Robert Peagler and others and are and have conspired to obstruct and delay the construction of said school facility; that all of said suits were frivolous and made in bad faith for the sole purpose of obstructing the orderly and lawful construction of said school facility; that even though the plaintiffs and their associates have failed in each and every action filed, they continue to file such suits; that the plaintiffs have been stubbornly litigious and have acted in bad faith by the institution of this complaint and others prior thereto and that the defendant is entitled to litigation expenses in the amount of $6,500; $118,000 as increased cost of construction; and $25,000 as punitive damages. The defendant Authority sought a judgment in these amounts and sought to have Robert Peagler made a party to respond to the counterclaim.
The Authority moved for a summary judgment, sought to have a jury try issues raised in its counterclaim; and sought to have the plaintiffs and Robert Peagler temporarily enjoined as prayed in the counterclaim until final disposition of the cause.
The plaintiffs moved to dismiss the counterclaim.
At the hearing on the motions the entire bond validation proceedings for said $732,000 were introduced in evidence. The trial judge in the bond validation proceeding in a comprehensive order found that the Ware County Board of Education, the State Board of Education and the Georgia Education Authority (Schools) were authorized to enter into the various leases and contracts in connection with the bond issue, and that each of them had taken all the necessary and proper action for the construction of said senior high school in Ware County. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed on appeal in Peagler v. State of Ga., supra.
The trial court granted the Authority's motion for summary judgment, enjoined the Georgia Education Authority (Schools) from accepting bids on the construction of the high school facility in Ware County until the appeal was disposed of and the remittitur returned to the trial court, and dismissed the counterclaim of the defendant Authority.
The defendant Authority filed an appeal from the dismissal of its counterclaim and that portion of the court's order which granted an injunction pending the appeal. The plaintiffs cross appeal from the judgment sustaining the Authority's motion for summary judgment. Hled:
1. The Georgia Education Authority (Schools) in its counterclaim against the plaintiffs for malicious use of civil process prayed for damages in the sum of $118,000 for increased cost of construction resulting from delay caused by...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ferguson v. Atlantic Land & Development Corp.
...Nat. Bank, 198 Ga. 591, 609(2), 32 S.E.2d 465; Alexander v. C. & S. Nat. Bank, 212 Ga. 295, 296(4), 92 S.E.2d 16; Ga. Ed. Auth. v. Davis, 227 Ga. 36, 40, 178 S.E.2d 853; Overstreet v. Schulman, 77 Ga.App. 320(1), 322, 48 S.E.2d 474; Medoc Corp. v. Keel, 152 Ga.App. 684, 685-688(2), 263 S.E.......
-
Winkles v. Brown, 26140
... ... No. 26140 ... Supreme Court of Georgia ... Dec. 3, 1970 ... Syllabus by the ... ...
-
Davis v. Ware County Bd. of Ed., 26154
...for review in Cases No. 26173 (Georgia Education Authority (Schools) v. Davis et al., and No. 26176 (Davis et al. v. Georgia Education Authority (Schools) et al., 227 Ga. 36, 178 S.E.2d 853). On June 29, 1970, the complainants in the Ware County litigation timely filed a notice of appeal fr......