Georgia Home Ins. Co. v. McKinley
Decision Date | 09 May 1896 |
Citation | 37 S.W. 606 |
Parties | GEORGIA HOME INS. CO. v. McKINLEY. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Action by William G. McKinley against the Georgia Home Insurance Company on a policy. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error. Affirmed.
Morgan & Thompson, for plaintiff in error. Templeton & Crosby, for defendant in error.
This suit was instituted by William G. McKinley against the Georgia Home Insurance Company upon a fire insurance policy to recover $1,300, the amount of the insurance provided in the policy. The defenses urged were: First, breach of the iron-safe clause; second, fraud and false swearing; and, third, arson. Trial was had before the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1,275.73. From this judgment the insurance company has prosecuted its writ of error. There is no statement of facts contained in the record, and the case is asked to be reviewed upon the conclusions of fact and law prepared and filed by the trial judge. The conclusions of the trial court are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Home Ins. Co. v. Connally
... ... for those not vacant, but not for those vacant. In line with ... this are Insurance Co. v. McKinley, 14 Tex.Civ.App ... 7, 37 S.W. 606; Insurance Co. v. Saindon, 53 Kan ... 623, 36 P. 983; Insurance Co. v. Tilley, 88 Va ... 1024, 14 S.E. 851; ... ...
-
State Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Kellner
...item would not invalidate that portion of the policy pertaining to the latter, so as to preclude recovery thereon. Ins. Co. v. McKinley, 14 Tex. Civ. App. 7, 37 S. W. 606; Roberts v. Ins. Co., 13 Tex. Civ. App. 64, 35 S. W. 955; Ins. Co. v. Green, 36 S. W. 143; Ins. Co. v. Tufts, 20 Tex. Ci......
-
Keller v. Liverpool & L. & G. Ins. Co.
...a warranty, and the doctrine announced in Goddard v. Insurance Co., 67 Tex. 69, 1 S. W. 906, 60 Am. Rep. 1, and Insurance Co. v. McKinley, 14 Tex. Civ. App. 11, 37 S. W. 606, has no application. Insurance Co. v. Cary (Tex. Civ. App.) 31 S. W. We do not think the evidence as above set out ra......
-
Palatine Ins. Co. v. McKinley
...of the iron-safe clause and the questions growing out of it, we refer to the opinion of Finley, J., in the case of Insurance Co. v. McKinley, 37 S. W. 606, which is a companion case to this, decided at the present term. In the absence of a statement of facts, it does not appear to us whethe......