Georgia M. & G.R. Co. v. Harris
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | SIMMONS, J. |
| Citation | Georgia M. & G.R. Co. v. Harris, 9 S.E. 786, 83 Ga. 393 (Ga. 1889) |
| Decision Date | 24 May 1889 |
| Parties | GEORGIA M. & G. R. CO. v. HARRIS. |
Error from superior court, Harris county; SMITH, Judge.
Goetchius & Chappell, for plaintiff in error.
Thornton & Cameron, for defendant in error.
Mrs Harris sued the railroad company for damages, alleging that the company had killed three of her cows. The defendant admitted that the cows were killed by the running of its train, and undertook to remove the presumption cast upon it by the law. The explanation of the defendant by the railroad employés was that it was a dark, foggy night; that the cows could not have been seen more than 25 or 30 yards, on account of the mist that prevailed at the time; that the train was a passenger train, and was running on schedule time, about 25 miles an hour; that the engine and the train were both in good condition, and the appliances for stopping the train were first class, it being supplied with air-brakes in perfect condition, and that the engine had a good head-light that the rails were wet, and the brakes did not hold as well when the track was wet as when dry; and that the light from the head-light was intercepted by the fog. The engineer...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Landers
...v. Sanders, 43 Ark. 225; Railway Co. v. Bragg (Ark.) 50 S. W. 273; Cantrell v. Railroad Co. (Miss.) 24 South. 871; Railroad Co. v. Harris, 83 Ga. 393, 9 S. E. 786. Witnesses for plaintiff fail to establish any negligence whatever. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new ...
-
Cent. Op Ga. Ry. Co v. Williams Buggy Co
...against it from proof of the killing of the stock, and the trial: udge erred in refusing to grant a new trial. Georgia M. & G. R. Co v. Harris, 9 S. E. 786, 83 Ga. 393; Georgia Southern & F. Ry. Co. v. Sanders, 36 S. E. 458, 111 Ga. 128. (Syllabus by the Court.) Error from City Court of Mac......