Georgia Trading Co. v. Marion County

Decision Date12 December 1901
Citation40 S.E. 250,114 Ga. 397
PartiesGEORGIA TRADING CO. v. MARION COUNTY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

The progress of an execution issued by the tax collector in due form for state and county taxes cannot be properly resisted by interposing an affidavit of illegality.

Error from superior court, Marion county; W. B. Butt, Judge.

Levy of execution by Marion county against the Georgia Trading Company. Defendant filed affidavit of illegality. From a judgment dismissing affidavit, it brings error. Affirmed.

W. B. Short and Geo. P. Munro, for plaintiff in error.

Simeon Blue and W. D. Crawford, for defendant in error.

LEWIS, J.

To the levy of an execution for state and county taxes issued by the tax collector of Marion county against the Georgia Trading Company the defendant in execution filed an affidavit of illegality, alleging that it had fully paid its taxes for the year for which the tax execution issued. Counsel for the county moved orally to dismiss the illegality on the ground that the law does not allow an illegality to be filed to a tax fi. fa. The court sustained this motion, and dismissed the affidavit, whereupon the defendant in execution brought the case to this court by bill of exceptions.

This case would seem to be decided by the provisions of section 903 of the Political Code, which declares that no judicial interference shall be had in any levy or distress for taxes under the provisions of the Code, but that the party injured shall be left to his proper remedy in any court of law having jurisdiction thereof. The language of the section, "any levy or distress for taxes under the provisions of this Code," is certainly broad enough to cover the levy in the case under consideration. The principle is also well settled by numerous decisions of this court. See Hawkins v. Sumter Co., 57 Ga. 166; Loan Ass'n v. Peters, 63 Ga. 351, and cases cited. It follows that the court below did not err in dismissing the affidavit of illegality.

Judgment affirmed. All the justices concurring.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT