Gerber Trade Finance, Inc. v. Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler, Llp
| Decision Date | 23 November 2004 |
| Docket Number | 4684. |
| Citation | 12 A.D.3d 286,786 N.Y.S.2d 9,2004 NY Slip Op 08611 |
| Parties | GERBER TRADE FINANCE, INC., Appellant, v. SKWIERSKY, ALPERT & BRESSLER, LLP, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
This is an action for negligence and negligent misrepresentation. Defendant is the accountant that prepared financial statements for the now-defunct Serrano, L.L.C., allegedly based on a faulty audit it had conducted of that company in 1999. Based on those statements, plaintiff continued to advance loans to Serrano. It is clear that plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant's alleged negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff's losses (see Laub v Faessel, 297 AD2d 28, 31 [2002]). The evidence clearly shows that Serrano failed because its biggest customer, K-Mart, had canceled two large purchase orders, causing Serrano's ultimate financial ruin nearly two years after the alleged accounting error in 1999.
Plaintiff's expert's report and affidavit were also insufficient to raise a triable issue as to defendant's alleged negligence. Essentially, plaintiff's expert opined that certain credits granted to Serrano were "fictitious" and thus improperly used to reduce accounts payable, leading to the audit reflection of a profit instead of a loss for 1999. However, this expert's conclusions are unsupported by facts, they are dependent on his personal opinion rather than on accounting principles, and are at odds with the uncontradicted testimony of a Serrano officer. The expert's opinion was conclusory, speculative and beyond the scope of expert opinion (see generally Kelly v Academy Broadway Corp., 206 AD2d 794, 795-796 [1994]; Espinosa v A & S Welding & Boiler Repair, 120 AD2d 435, 437 [1986]).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Parmalat Securities Litigation, This document relates to: 06 Civ. 0383, 06 Civ. 3109.
...41 A.D.3d 788, 838 N.Y.S.2d 667, 667 (2d Dep't 2007) (accounting malpractice); Gerber Trade Finance, Inc. v. Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler, LLP, 12 A.D.3d 286, 286, 786 N.Y.S.2d 9, 10 (1st Dep't 2004) (negligent misrepresentation); Laub v. Faessel, 297 A.D.2d 28, 30-31, 745 N.Y.S.2d 534, 536......
-
Garcia v. City of New York
...it lacking in probative value because it is not supported by evidence in the record ( see e.g. Gerber Trade Fin., Inc. v. Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler, LLP, 12 A.D.3d 286, 786 N.Y.S.2d 9 [2004],lv. denied4 N.Y.3d 705, 794 N.Y.S.2d 300, 827 N.E.2d 284 [2005] ). 1. Knowledge acquired by an ag......
-
Talon Air Serv. Llc v. Studio
...Castro v. New York Univ., 5 A.D.3d 135, 773 N.Y.S.2d 29 [2004] ); see e.g. Gerber Trade Fin., Inc. v. Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler, LLP, 12 A.D.3d 286, 786 N.Y.S.2d 9 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 705, 794 N.Y.S.2d 300, 827 N.E.2d 284 [2005] ). Here, plaintiff's expert's opinion, that the tre......
-
Aldridge v. Brodman
...as to whether defendant[s'] alleged [conduct] was a proximate cause of plaintiff[s'] losses” ( Gerber Trade Fin., Inc. v. Skwiersky, Alpert & Bressler, LLP, 12 A.D.3d 286, 286, 786 N.Y.S.2d 9,lv. denied4 N.Y.3d 705, 794 N.Y.S.2d 300, 827 N.E.2d 284). “Where a party has failed to come forwar......