Gessner v. Powell, 39439
| Decision Date | 15 July 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 39439,39439 |
| Citation | 238 So.2d 101 |
| Parties | Milton John GESSNER, Petitioner, v. Frank POWELL, Sr., Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Lake Lytal, Jr., of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery & D'Aiuto, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Harry Lee Anstead, for Simpson & Anstead, West Palm Beach, for respondent.
This cause is before the court on certiorari granted to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Powell v. Gessner, Fla.App.1970, 231 So.2d 50. We issued the writ because of an apparent conflict in the interpretation of the adoption statute, § 63.151, Fla.Stat.1969, F.S.A., between the decision here reviewed and that of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in In re Levy's Estate, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 803.
The sole issue in the cause Sub judice is whether a minor child who has been legally adopted by another has a right of action for the wrongful death of his natural father. In holding that the legal adoption had the effect of removing the child from the category of a surviving 'minor child' within the meaning and intent of the Wrongful Death Act, § 768.02, Fla.Stat.1969, F.S.A., the appellate court said that, except for the right of an adopted child to inherit from his natural parents (which is expressly reserved by the adoption statute) the effect of a legal adoption is to sever completely 'every legal and moral tie which theretofore existed between the child and its natural parent or parents.' In the Levy case, supra, the sole issue was whether persons who had been legally adopted by others were entitled to an intestate share of the estate of a collateral blood relative. In holding that they were entitled to inherit, the court said that the adoption statutes give new rights to adoptees but do not attempt 'to limit or take away rights already in existence with the exception that the natural parent may not inherit from his natural child who has been adopted.'
It is clear that, under the express terms of Florida's statute, a decree of adoption has the effect of severing the Legal ties between a child and his natural parents, except for the inheritance rights expressly reserved. No other construction of § 63.151, supra, is possible. It reads as follows insofar as here relevant:--
'After the adoption the natural parents, if living, are relieved of all legal duties and obligations due from them to the child and are divested of all rights with respect to the child * * *'.
Conversely,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garner v. Ward
...which conflicts with a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (Powell v. Gessner, 231 So.2d 50, writ disch., Fla., 238 So.2d 101) on the same point of law. Fla.Const., art. V, § 4 The decisions here for review both concern application of Fla.Stat. §§ 768.01 and 768.02, F.......
-
Dade County v. AT & T Information Systems, 85-216
...court considers a factual situation not contemplated by the legislature. Powell v. Gessner, 231 So.2d 50, 53 (Fla. 4th DCA), aff'd, 238 So.2d 101 (Fla.1970). It is undisputed that at the time the ordinance and statute in question were enacted, the legislature could not have contemplated the......
-
Domino's Pizza, LLC v. Wiederhold
...to its right to sue for the wrongful death of a parent is determined at the time of the death of the parent."), opinion adopted, 238 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1970). It also would be contrary to the legislative intent expressed in section 768.17, Florida Statutes (2012), which states, "It is the publ......
-
Estate of Carlton, In re
...adoptive brothers and sisters but no further. 141 So.2d at 805. In re Levy's Estate, supra, was considered by the Court in Gessner v. Powell, 238 So.2d 101 (Fla.1970), in disposing of an alleged conflict between the decision in that case and that of a district court of appeal ruling that an......