Ghali v. Ghali

Decision Date07 March 1980
Citation596 S.W.2d 31
PartiesNabil Nashed GHALI, Appellant, v. Linda Diane GHALI, Appellee.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Arnold S. Taylor, O'Hara, Ruberg, Osborne & Taylor, Covington, for appellant.

Harry P. Hellings, Jr., Jolly, Johnson, Blau & Parry, Newport, for appellee.

Before VANCE, WHITE and WINTERSHEIMER, JJ.

WINTERSHEIMER, Judge.

This appeal is from that portion of a judgment entered May 8, 1979, which awarded the wife $150.00 per week child support for one child and two valuable rings.

The parties have been married twice, the first time being on January 19, 1975, which marriage was terminated by divorce on June 11, 1975. They were remarried on June 30, 1977, but separated on September 2, 1977. This dissolution proceeding was initiated by the wife and the case was referred to the Master Commissioner, who heard testimony and rendered findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The trial court rejected the Master's recommendation of $200.00 per week child support and reduced the amount to $150.00, but adopted the recommendation that two rings, valued at $800.00 and $4,000.00, be retained by the wife.

The appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error in awarding the two rings and in granting $150.00 per week as child support.

This Court affirms the judgment of the trial court because the findings were not clearly erroneous and the award of child support is not an abuse of discretion.

The trial judge was not clearly erroneous in finding that the two rings were gifts to the wife within the meaning of KRS 403.190. The statute provides that each spouse may be assigned personal property. Here, the evidence supports the determination that the rings were gifts.

We are not persuaded by the appellant's arguments as to the award of the rings. The authorities used by the appellant relate more to the former restoration statute and not to the current law. Angel v. Angel, Ky.App., 562 S.W.2d 661 (1978) does not apply to this situation.

It is well settled that Civil Rule 52.01 applies to domestic matters and that the principles of that rule require reviewing courts to accept findings of a trial judge unless they are clearly erroneous.

The award of child support does not represent an abuse of discretion by the trial judge. Bradley v. Bradley, Ky., 473 S.W.2d 117 (1971). The majority of the wife's expenses remain fixed, regardless of the number of people living in the household. Any benefit the wife's other child may...

To continue reading

Request your trial
50 cases
  • Sexton v. Sexton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 22 January 2004
    ...and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses."); Ghali v. Ghali, Ky.App., 596 S.W.2d 31, 32 (1980) ("The trial judge was not clearly erroneous in finding that the two rings were gifts to the wife within the meaning of KRS 403.......
  • Hammond v. Hammond
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 4 April 2014
    ...to judge the creditability of witnesses and the evidence presented to it. See Adkins v. Meade, 246 S.W.2d 980 (Ky. 1952); Ghali v. Ghali, 596 S.W.2d 31 (Ky. App.1980). Moreover,A family court operating as finder of fact has extremely broad discretion with respect to testimony presented, and......
  • Clark v. Clark
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 5 January 1990
    ...specifically states that a gift given to one spouse during the marriage is not considered marital property. This Court in Ghali v. Ghali, Ky.App., 596 S.W.2d 31 (1980), held that the trial court's determination concerning the gift or nongift status of an item, must be upheld unless there is......
  • Stipp v. Charles
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 2 July 2009
    ...if they are clearly erroneous. Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure (CR) 52.01; Sexton v. Sexton, 125 S.W.3d 258 (Ky.2004); Ghali v. Ghali, 596 S.W.2d 31 (Ky.App.1980). CR 52.01 states, in Findings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and due respect shall be given to the o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • § 6.02 Property Acquired by Gift
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Divorce, Separation and the Distribution of Property Title CHAPTER 6 Types of Property That Frequently Are Designated Separate Property by Statute
    • Invalid date
    ...2001). Illinois: In re Marriage of Weinstein, 128 Ill. App.3d 234, 83 Ill. Dec. 425, 470 N.E.2d 551 (1984). Kentucky: Ghali v. Ghali, 596 S.W.2d 31 (Ky. App. 1981). Missouri: Townsend v. Townsend, 705 S.W.2d 595 (Mo. App. 1986). Rhode Island: Quinn v. Quinn, 512 A.2d 848 (R.I. 1986). Pennsy......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT