Gibbons v. State
Decision Date | 03 February 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 38026,38026 |
Citation | 248 Ga. 858,286 S.E.2d 717 |
Parties | , 30 A.L.R.4th 404 Clifton Edward GIBBONS v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Vernon J. Neely, Flanagan & Neely, Augusta, for Clifton Edward gibbons.
Richard Allen, Dist. Atty., W. Leon Barfield, Asst. Dist. Atty., Augusta, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for the State.
Clifton Edward Gibbons was indicted for the murder of Lloyd O. Agner, convicted of that offense by a jury in Burke County, Georgia, and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, he presents eleven enumerations of error, the last contending that "the evidence is insufficient as proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of murder." We reach this enumeration first. Lewis v. State, 248 Ga. 566, 285 S.E.2d 179 (1981).
To establish the circumstances of the case, we set out the statement of facts contained in the brief submitted by the District Attorney of the Augusta Judicial Circuit:
In further illustration of the factual situation, we set out a portion of the Statement of Facts as contained in the brief filed by the Attorney General:
The statement of facts contained in Gibbons' brief is not materially inconsistent with the foregoing.
* * *
The evidence is amply sufficient to support a finding by a jury that Lloyd O. Agner...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hutton
...to preserve a [c]onfrontation [c]lause objection to prior statements by the witness." Id., at 467.13 See Gibbons v. State , 248 Ga. 858, 862–64, 286 S.E.2d 717 (1982).14 We note that because Barksdale was decided prior to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Crawford , the court, i......
-
Hill v. State
...the investigator was called by the state to testify about the prior inconsistent statements of the inmate witness. See Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 286 S.E.2d 717 (1982). Hill contends that the notice provisions of OCGA § 17-10-2 were not complied with and the testimony of these two witne......
-
Williams v. State
...could not impeach his own witness. In enumeration of error twenty-one, appellant argues this ruling was error, citing Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 286 S.E.2d 717 (1982), Davis v. State, 249 Ga. 309, 290 S.E.2d 273 (1982), and Ranger v. State, 249 Ga. 315, 290 S.E.2d 63 (1982). These three......
-
Green v. State
...of a witness who takes the stand and is subject to cross-examination is admissible as substantive evidence." Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 862, 286 S.E.2d 717 (1982). At Green's trial, Robinson clearly was reluctant to testify against Green and responded "I don't know" when asked multiple ......
-
10 Evidence and Handling Witnesses
...and, if the witness is available for cross-examination, these statements are also admissible as substantive evidence [Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 286 SE2d 717 (1982)]. 1. During examination of a witness, his/her prior written or oral statement need not be shown nor its contents disclosed......
-
Evidence - Marc T. Treadwell
...at 283. 95. 509 U.S. 579 (1993). 96. O.C.G.A. Sec. 24-9-67.1 (f). 97. See Condra, 292 Ga. App. at 278, 664 S.E.2d at 283. 98. Id. 99. 248 Ga. 858, 286 S.E.2d 717 (1982). 100. Id. at 862, 286 S.E.2d at 721. 101. 254 Ga. 745, 334 S.E.2d 661 (1985). 102. Id. at 745, 344 S.E.2d at 662. 103. 269......
-
10 Evidence and Handling Witnesses
...and, if the witness is available for cross-examination, these statements are also admissible as substantive evidence [Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 286 SE2d 717 (1982)]. 1. During examination of a witness, his/her prior written or oral statement need not be shown nor its contents disclosed......
-
10 Evidence and Witnesses
...and, if the witness is available for cross-examination, these statements are also admissible as substantive evidence [Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 286 SE2d 717 (1982)]. 1. During examination of a witness, his/her prior written or oral statement need not be shown nor its contents disclosed......