Gibbs v. Warden of Ga. State Pen., Hardwick, Ga., Civ. A. No. 76-31-AMER.
Decision Date | 24 May 1978 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 76-31-AMER. |
Citation | 450 F. Supp. 242 |
Parties | Janie H. GIBBS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN OF the GEORGIA STATE PENITENTIARY, HARDWICK, GEORGIA, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Georgia |
Frank K. Martin, Martin, Kilpatrick & Davidson, Columbus, Ga., for petitioner.
Isaac Byrd, Staff Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Janie Gibbs, a state prisoner presently serving five consecutive life sentences imposed after a jury found her guilty of the poisoning murders of five of her close relatives, petitions this court for habeas corpus relief. Her sole contention challenges the voluntariness of her confession given during custodial interrogation after waiver of rights. The confession was admitted into evidence after the trial judge held a Jackson v. Denno hearing and concluded the confession was voluntary upon a preponderance of the evidence.1 His conclusion was affirmed on appeal. Gibbs v. The State, 235 Ga. 480, 220 S.E.2d 254 (1975).2 Ms. Gibbs may only obtain relief from this court upon demonstrating that her state record does not fairly support the trial court's finding that her confession was voluntary. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(d)(8); Casias v. Beto, 459 F.2d 54 (5th Cir. 1972). Unlike her Jackson v. Denno hearing, in this habeas petition Ms. Gibbs carries the burden of proof. Lokos v. Capps, 528 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1976).
The record reveals that Ms. Gibbs' interrogation was conducted under circumstances and in a fashion which bore not the slightest hint of improper compulsion by the police. The police officers showed Ms. Gibbs considerable courtesy and consideration during the interrogation. She appeared to be intelligent and alert. The statement which she eventually signed and which was used against her at trial is very detailed. She clearly recalled events which transpired long before giving the statement. Throughout her interrogation she was repeatedly advised of her Miranda rights. The confession itself begins with a recitation of those rights and a statement that she understood them. The police officers had no reason to suspect that Janie Gibbs was mentally incompetent at the time she waived her rights and gave her confession. However, approximately forty five days after she confessed, a Georgia jury found Ms. Gibbs incompetent to stand trial, and at her Jackson v. Denno hearing prior to her eventual trial, there was considerable psychiatric testimony that Janie Gibbs was a psychotic suffering from schizophrenia for a number of years which included the period during which she confessed.
The court's discussion in Blackburn, notably such language as that quoted above, arguably implies that all confessions given by individuals suffering severe psychosis are always inadmissible even if the individual's psychosis is not shown to be the probable reason for the confession. However, although the fairness concerns would appear to be precisely similar, there is no per se rule that all confessions given while under the influence of drugs or alcohol are inadmissible. Ortiz v. United States, 318 F.2d 450 (9th Cir. 1963); United States v. Arcediano, 371 F.Supp. 457 (N.J.1974). Likewise, that a confessor possesses a substantially subnormal mentality is a fact indicating, but not establishing, that his confession was involuntary. See Sanchez v. Beto, 467 F.2d 513 (5th Cir. 1972); Cooper v. Griffin, 455 F.2d 1142 (5th Cir. 1972); Molingnaro v. Smith, 408 F.2d 795 (5th Cir. 1969); Lathers v. United States, 396 F.2d 524 (5th Cir. 1968). Consequently this court concludes that there is no per se rule holding inadmissible confessions given by individuals suffering severe psychotic conditions. Rather, a confession is inadmissible if it would not have been obtained but for the effects of the confessor's psychosis. There is nothing unfair about using the admissions of a psychotic individual where the giving of the admissions is not substantially related to the effects of the psychosis. In such a case, no advantage has been taken of the individual's disability.
On the present record it must be concluded that Janie Gibbs was suffering from a severe psychosis during a period of years which include the time she gave her confession. However, as discussed above, simply showing that Ms. Gibbs was suffering from a psychosis does not require that her confession be found inadmissible. There must be a showing that the effects of Ms. Gibbs' psychosis substantially contributed to the giving of her confession. Various courts have made reference to the type of effects which require that confessions be held inadmissible. Ms. Gibbs' confession is inadmissible if it appears that her psychosis rendered her incapable of understanding the meaning and effect of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pruett v. Thigpen, EC84-31-LS.
...record did not fairly support the finding of voluntariness. Casias v. Beto, 459 F.2d 54 (5th Cir.1972); Gibbs v. Warden of Georgia State Penitentiary, 450 F.Supp. 242 (M.D.Ga., 1978), aff'd, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir.1979). Both the trial court and the Mississippi Supreme Court found Pruett's ......
-
Com. v. Vazquez
...of the psychosis. In such a case, no advantage has been taken of the individual's disability." 8 Gibbs v. Warden of the Ga. State Penitentiary, 450 F.Supp. 242, 244 (M.D.Ga.1978), aff'd 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. b. Statements to civilians. The defendant made two statements to civilians, which......
-
Com. v. Libran
...if it would not have been obtained but for the effects of the confessor's mental disease. Id., quoting Gibbs v. Warden of Ga. State Penitentiary, 450 F.Supp. 242, 244 (M.D.Ga.1978), aff'd, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir.1979). After a hearing, the judge concluded that any mental impairment that the......
-
Com. v. Chung
...will . . . it is not admissible and its reception in evidence constitutes a deprivation of due process." Cf. Gibbs v. Warden, State Penitentiary, 450 F.Supp. 242, 244 (M.D.Ga.1978) ("a confession is inadmissible if it would not have been obtained but for the effects of the confessor's psych......