Gibson v. State, 61372
| Decision Date | 17 February 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 61372,61372 |
| Citation | 436 So.2d 32 |
| Parties | Julian L. GIBSON and Alfred J. Gibson, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal--Direct Conflict of Decisions. Third District--Case Nos. 78-336 and 78-1012.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert R. Schrank, Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for petitioners.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
On February 23, 1982, this Court entered its order accepting jurisdiction and dispensing with oral argument. After further consideration, we decline to accept jurisdiction. We therefore deny the petition for review. 403 So.2d 1019.
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Morton v. State
...(Fla.1982); Leary v. State, 406 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Gibson v. State, 403 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 436 So.2d 32 (Fla.1983); McMurtroy v. State, 400 So.2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 408 So.2d 1094 (Fla.1981); Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 19......
- Stephens v. State, 83-403
-
Daizi v. Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, 82-776
...of petitioner's sentences in Daizi v. State, 396 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The Florida Supreme Court's opinion in State v. Gibson, 436 So.2d 32 (Fla.1983), indicates that there is a question regarding the legality of the petitioner's sentences. However, the question presented by this p......