Gilbert v. Cherry

Decision Date31 July 1876
Citation57 Ga. 128
PartiesJohn L. Gilbert, plaintiff in error. v. William A. Cherry, defendant in error.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

[COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.]

Contracts. Vendor and purchaser. Fraud. Equity. Practice in the superior court. Damages. Before Judge Hill. Bibb Superior Court. October Adjourned Term, 1875.

The following, taken in connection with the above headnotes, sufficiently reports this case:

Cherry brought case against Gilbert for failure to comply with the following written contract:

"Georgia—Bibb County.

"The undersigned have this day entered into the following agreement: William A. Cherry agrees to sell J. E. Gilbert his plantation, consisting of about eight hundred acres, part in woods and part in open land, situate in Bibb county, between one and four miles from Macon, and being lands bought by said Cherry from the estates of Job Taylor, Robert B. Washington, John Boston, M. E. Rylander, Asa Holt, M S. Thomson, A. Dutenhoffer, known as swamp or River land, on thefollowing terms: Mr. Gilbert is to sow all the open lands mentioned in oats, at the usual time of sowing among farmers, and to take the usual pains to make a crop, and when the crop of oats is made the said Gilbert is to have them harvested at the usual time of harvesting oats, and to bale and deliver the same, at his expense, to said Cherry, in the city of Macon; in consideration of which the said Cherry agrees to convey to said Gilbert good titles to and for the part of the land which was so cultivated, and also for all the balance of the said eight hundred acres, provided said Gilbert pays him for each acre of the said balance of the said land the market value of the oats made on each acre of the land so cultivated, that is to say, the value of the oats so raised on an average acre of said land so sown in oats is to be the price said Gilbert is to pay per acre for said remainder of said land; and if said Gilbert does not agree to give that price so ascertained for said land, then he has the option of sowing said land in oats for the next *ensuing year, and to pay the value of said remainder of said land as ascertained as aforesaid in the oats to be so raised and grown in the second crop year, the first crop year ending in the spring of 1874. Upon the reasonable compliance with all these stipulations the said Cherry is to execute to said Gilbert or his assigns title in fee simple to and for all of said lands. The value of the said crop of oats is to be the market value thereof when duly delivered by said Gilbert to said Cherry, after they are harvested as above provided. The said lands are supposed to be about eight hundred acres, but the actual number of acres can hereafter be ascertained. The open lands herein agreed to be sown in oats are such as can be reasonably prepared and put in oats in the judgment of said Gilbert.

"Witness our hands and seals, this 4th day of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Black v. The North Dakota State Fair Association for Grand Forks
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • 22 Marzo 1917
    ...exact justice than in the cases of lost limbs, losses by fire, and in other like cases. Tootle v. Kent, 12 Okla. 674, 73 P. 310; Gilbert v. Cherry, 57 Ga. 128; Cranmer v. Kohn, 7 S.D. 247, 64 N.W. World's Fair in Chicago, 1893; World's Columbian Exposition v. Pasteur-Chamberland Filter Co.,......
  • McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 13 Mayo 1895
    ...Thompson & Cook (N.Y.), 60; McGean v. Railroad, 117 N.Y. 219; Avery v. Railroad, 121 N.Y. 31; Atkins v. Railroad, 10 N.Y.S. 432; Gilbert v. Cherry, 57 Ga. 128; Railroad v. Varner, 19 Ala. 185: Norman Wells, 17 Wend. 137; Lincoln v. Railroad, 23 Wend. 425; Brown v. Railroad, 12 R.I. 238. "Th......
  • Dannelly v. Cuthbert Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 17 Diciembre 1908
    ...see the following authorities: Greer v. Caldwell, 14 Ga. 207, 58 Am.Dec. 553; Hansford v. Freeman, 99 Ga. 376, 27 S.E. 706; Gilbert v. Cherry, 57 Ga. 128; v. Bennett, 98 Ga. 413, 25 S.E. 510; Reese v. Wyman, 9 Ga. 430; Neil v. Bunn, 58 Ga. 583; Bell v. Railroad, 76 Ga. 754; New England Mfg.......
  • Stewart v. Lanier House Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 17 Febrero 1886
    ...for plaintiff in error, cited Code, §§3073, 2944; 9 Exch., 341, 354; 49 N. H., 45; 6 Am. R., 460; 16 N.Y. 489; 63 Id., 561; 7 Cush., 516; 57 Ga. 128; 33 401, 404 et seq.; 33 Iowa 424, 501; 18 C. B. (N. S.), 443; 20 L. & Eq. Rep., 41; 60 Ga. 148; 68 Id., 780; 22 Id., 269; 26 Id., 125; 56 Id.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT