Gilbert v. State, 193
| Decision Date | 15 January 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 193,193 |
| Parties | Willie GILBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. . Houston (14th Dist.) |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Edward R. Baird, Houston, for appellant.
Crawford C. Martin, Nola White, Hawthorne Phillips, Robert C. Flowers, Monroe Clayton, Austin, for appellee.
This is a suit for alleged wrongful imprisonment under the provisions of Article 1176a, Vernon's Ann.Penal Code. Appellant, Willie Gilbert, brought suit against The State of Texas seeking compensation for an alleged wrongful imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for approximately fourteen years.
The appellant was convicted of murder with malice in 1953 in Cause No. 68267 in Criminal District Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas. He was found guilty and sentenced by the trial judge to a term of 99 years. The judgment of conviction was affirmed on appeal. See Gilbert v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 424, 265 S.W.2d 100 (1953). On August 7, 1965, the Court of Criminal Appeals, without written opinion, denied appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus. Thereafter, appellant filed his petition for habeas corpus in the federal court where, on July 31, 1967, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, granted him relief on the grounds that his confession had been unconstitutionally obtained and ordered the State of Texas to grant appellant a new trial within ninety days 'failing which he shall have his release.' The State of Texas did not appeal from this order. On November 7, 1967, upon motion of the State, fourteen years after the original trial, the criminal accusation against appellant was dismissed because of 'insufficient evidence,' and appellant was released from custody.
No pardon or proclamation has been issued by the Governor of Texas to appellant.
The case was tried without a jury, a jury having been waived, and after consideration of the stipulations, the pleadings, the evidence and argument of counsel the trial court denied appellant relief and entered judgment for The State of Texas as a matter of law, because appellant had not received a pardon as required by Section 2 of Article 1176a, such as would entitle him to claim compensation under said article. From the judgment of the trial court appellant, Willie Gilbert, has perfected his appeal.
Appellant contends that no conviction exists against him for which he can obtain a pardon, and that the dismissal of the indictment against him and the order releasing him from custody is effective under the statute in the place of the required full pardon.
Prior to the amendment of the Texas Constitution in 1956, an action could not be maintained against the State of Texas for damages or aid and compensation upon grounds of wrongful conviction or imprisonment.
In 1956, the Constitution was amended by the adoption of Section 51--c to Article III, which reads:
'The Legislature may grant aid and compensation to any person who has heretofore paid a fine or served a sentence in prison, or who may hereafter pay a fine or serve a sentence in prison, under the laws of this State for an offense for which he or she is not guilty, under such regulations and limitations as the Legislature may deem expedient.'
This constitutional amendment was held not self-enacting in State v. Clements, 319 S.W.2d 450, 453 (Tex.Civ .App.), writ ref. In Clements the Court said that aid and compensation, if the plaintiff is to have it, would have to be determined under such regulations as the Legislature might enact. These 'regulations' were provided by the Legislature in 1965 with the enactment of Article 1176a, Vernon's Ann.Penal Code. Section 2 of Art. 1176a provides as follows:
'Sec. 2. A person is entitled to compensation provided by this Act:
(a) if he has served, in whole or in part, a sentence in prison under the laws of this State; and
(b) if he pleaded 'not guilty' to the charge for which he was convicted and which led to the imprisonment; and
(c) if he is not guilty of the crime for which he was sentenced; and
(d) if he has received a full pardon for the crime and punishment for which he was sentenced.'
The power to grant pardons in criminal cases is vested solely in the Governor by Article IV, Section 11, of the Constitution of Texas, which provides that the Governor can exercise such power only upon the written recommendation and advice of the Board of Pardons and Paroles. See also Art. 48.01, Vernon's Ann.Code of Criminal Procedure. With full knowledge of the exclusive power in the Governor to grant unconditional pardons, the Legislature provided in Section 5 of Art. 1176a that the pardon issued by the Governor is admissible as evidence in a suit...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Hosken
...into question by this habeas corpus proceeding--only the legality of his detention is relevant. Gilbert v. State, 437 S.W.2d 444, 447 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston--14th Dist., 1969, error ref. n.r.e.). Consequently, our action discharging Relator from custody under the order herein mentioned is w......
-
Crosland v. Texas Employment Commission
... ... State Highway Dept. v. Gorham, 139 Tex. 361, 162 S.W.2d 934, 936 (1942); Anderson v. Penix, 138 Tex. 596, ... State v. Standard, 414 S.W.2d 148, 153 (Tex.1967); Gilbert v. State, 437 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.) 1969, writ ref'd n. r. e.). In ... ...
-
Harris County Dist. Attorney's Office v. M.G.G.
... ... Burns, 825 S.W.2d 198 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, writ denied); State v. Knight, 813 S.W.2d 210, 211-12 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, no writ); Texas Dept. of ... The court has no equitable power to extend the clear meaning of the statute. Gilbert v. State, 437 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 5 ... ...
-
Texas Employment Com'n v. Norris
... ... , but the very statute which acted as his key to the courthouse door in his suit against the State provided: "A petition for judicial review shall not act as a supersedeas." ... In ... v. State, 121 Tex. 138, 47 S.W.2d 265, 272 (1932). See also, Gilbert" v. State, 437 S.W.2d 444, 446 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston (14th Dist.) 1969, writ ref'd n. r. e.) ... \xC2" ... ...