Gill v. Bennett, 2808.
Decision Date | 06 April 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 2808.,2808. |
Parties | GILL v. BENNETT. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Ward County; J. A. Drane, Judge.
Suit by J. R. Bennett against R. H. Gill and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, named defendant appeals.
Reversed and rendered.
Upton & Upton, of San Angelo, for appellant.
Kemp & Nagle, of El Paso, and Brian Montague, of Del Rio, for appellee.
This is a suit by J. R. Bennett against R. H. Gill and others.
The controversy is over an undivided 7/1024 interest in the minerals in a section of land containing 640 acres. The defendants, other than Gill, are conceded to be the owners of an undivided 127/128 mineral interest; and, as to those defendants, and that interest, no point is presented by the appeal. The point at issue is whether Bennett owns an undivided 1/128 (8/1024) interest in the minerals, or an undivided 1/1024 interest. The issue was found in favor of Bennett, and Gill appeals.
The appeal is presented upon an agreed statement of facts.
This agreement discloses the following:
J. D. Jones, the owner of the section, conveyed to Bennett an undivided 1/16 interest in and to all of the oil, gas, and other minerals in and under, and that might be produced from, an undivided 80 acres out of said section, together with the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of mining, drilling, and exploring said land for oil, gas, and other minerals and removing the same.
Thereafter, on December 7, 1926, Jones executed an oil and gas lease on said section to Gill on a regular 88 form. The lessee agreed:
The lease also provides: "If said lessor owns a less interest in the above described land than the entire and undivided fee simple estate therein, then the royalties and rentals herein provided for shall be paid the said lessor only in proportion which their interest bears to the whole and undivided fee."
Gill conveyed to various parties the interest in the oil and gas in the section of land which he acquired by the foregoing lease, and it is agreed that such assignees (who are the other defendants) own 7/8 of the oil and gas in the section. As to these assignees it was agreed "that they are the owners of seven-eighths of the oil and gas in, on and under said section of land."
On January 13, 1927, Bennett executed and delivered to J. D. Jones an instrument which reads:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Montgomery v. Rittersbacher
...v. Pickens, 155 Tex. 221, 285 S.W.2d 201 (1955); Loeffler v. King, 149 Tex. 626, 236 S.W.2d 772 (1951); Gill v. Bennett, 59 S.W.2d 473 (Tex.Civ.App.--El Paso 1933, writ ref'd); Van Deventer v. Gulf Production Co., 41 S.W.2d 1029 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1931, writ ref'd); Texas & Pacific Coa......
-
Little v. Mountain View Dairies
...By ratifying the lease defendant agreed that this is a fair charge for the expense of bringing the oil to the surface. Gill v. Bennett, Tex.Civ.App., 59 S.W.2d 473, 475; Texas & Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Kirtley, Tex.Civ.App., 288 S.W. 619, 622. 'If a lease be executed by a cotenant, the no......
-
Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas Co.
... ... Axis Petroleum Co. v. Taylor, 42 Cal.App.2d 389, 108 ... P.2d 978; Gill v. Bennett, Tex. Civ.App., 59 S.W.2d ... 473. In its petition plaintiff stated the facts in ... ...
-
Aycock v. Vantage Fort Worth Energy, LLC
...Van Deventer v. Gulf Prod. Co., 41 S.W.2d 1029, 1038 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1931, writ ref'd); see also Gill v. Bennett, 59 S.W.2d 473, 475 (Tex. Civ. App.—El Paso 1933, writ ref'd) (holding that if nonconsenting cotenant ratified lease, he became "a participating royalty owner and entitl......