Gillis v. Benefit Trust Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 17 July 1992 |
Citation | 601 So.2d 951 |
Parties | William C. GILLIS v. BENEFIT TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. 1910382. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
James P. Rea of Hogan, Smith, Alspaugh, Samples & Pratt, P.C., Birmingham, for appellant.
Frank C. Wilson III and Harry W. Gamble, Jr. of Gamble, Gamble, Calame & Wilson, Selma, for appellee.
The plaintiff, William C. Gillis, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Benefit Trust Life Insurance Company.
On March 16, 1987, Gillis and his wife, Nellie Gillis, applied for health insurance with the defendant. As part of the application process, Gillis requested the "Check-o-matic" payment plan. The Check-o-matic plan allowed Benefit Trust to withdraw preauthorized checks from Gillis's checking account to cover the insurance premiums on the policy for him and his wife. 1 The monthly premium for the policy was $239.85.
On July 31, 1988, Mrs. Gillis died. Before her death, Gillis had made several health insurance claims for Mrs. Gillis. On August 24, 1988, Benefit Trust acknowledged the death of Mrs. Gillis and denied coverage for any claims made on her behalf under the policy. In a letter to Gillis, Benefit Trust stated that it would:
Or in the alternative, Benefit Trust would:
"Rescind the entire policy with a refund of all premium paid for all listed family members."
Benefit Trust stated that Gillis must choose between the amendment or the rescission within 20 days of August 24, 1988, or else Benefit Trust would rescind the entire policy. It is undisputed that Benefit Trust continued to draw checks on Gillis's checking account until December 1988.
On August 30, 1988, Gillis sued Benefit Trust, alleging breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, bad faith, breach of duty to pay, outrage, and failure to pay insurance claims. All of these claims were related to Benefit Trust's alleged failure to pay health insurance claims for Mrs. Gillis. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Benefit Trust on all the claims. Gillis then moved to amend his complaint to include a claim of conversion; the trial court granted that motion, but then entered a summary judgment for the defendant on that claim. Gillis appeals from the summary judgment on the conversion claim.
A summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving party shows "that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Rule 56(c), A.R.Civ.P. Once the moving party has made a prima facie showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact, the nonmoving party must rebut that showing by presenting substantial...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Simple Helix, LLC v. Relus Techs., LLC
...detention or interference with another's property." Covington v. Exxon Co. , 551 So.2d 935 (Ala. 1989) ; Gillis v. Benefit Tr. Life Ins. Co. , 601 So. 2d 951 (Ala. 1992) ; Gray v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co. , 623 So. 2d 1156 (Ala. 1993). The elements of conversion " ‘include a wrongful tak......
-
In re Perry County Foods, Inc.
...v. Pal, 791 So.2d 947 (Ala.2001), Huntsville Golf Development, Inc. v. Ratcliff, 646 So.2d 1334 (Ala.1994), Gillis v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance Co., 601 So.2d 951 (Ala.1992), Rainey v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 294 Ala. 139, 313 So.2d 179 (1975), Automotive Acceptance Corp. v. Powell, 45 Al......
-
Phillips v. Consol. Publ'g Co., CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV213-069
...Smith, 657 So. 2d 821, 823 (Ala. 1994) (citing Gray v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 623 So. 2d 1156 (Ala. 1993); Gillis v. Benefit Tr. Life Ins. Co., 601 So. 2d 951 (Ala. 1992); and Covington v. Exxon Co., U.S.A., 551 So. 2d 935 (Ala. 1989)). "[T]he bare possession of property without some ......
-
Spencer v. Pub. Storage
...Gray v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 623 So. 2d 1156 (Ala. 1993); Driver v. Hice, 618 So. 2d 129 (Ala. 1993); Gillis v. Benefit Trust Life Ins. Co., 601 So. 2d 951 (Ala. 1992).Drennen Land & Timber Co. v. Privett, 643 So. 2d 1347, 1349 (Ala. 1994).To [establish] conversion, there must be a ......