Giokas v. Giokas

Decision Date04 May 2010
Citation73 A.D.3d 688,900 N.Y.S.2d 370
PartiesGeorge GIOKAS, respondent, v. Eugenia GIOKAS, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
900 N.Y.S.2d 370
73 A.D.3d 688


George GIOKAS, respondent,
v.
Eugenia GIOKAS, appellant.


Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

May 4, 2010.

900 N.Y.S.2d 371

England & England, P.C., Centereach, N.Y. (Donna England of counsel), for appellant.

Castrovinci & Mady, Smithtown, N.Y. (Philip J. Castrovinci and Ruth Sovronsky of counsel), for respondent.

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., JOSEPH COVELLO, RUTH C. BALKIN, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

73 A.D.3d 688

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (MacKenzie, J.), entered October 3, 2008, as, upon a decision dated April 17, 2008, and upon a supplemental decision dated May 29, 2008, both made after a nonjury trial, directed the plaintiff to pay her maintenance in the sum of only $500 per week, nontaxable to her, only from April 24, 2008, and continuing until the earliest of her remarriage, whether valid or invalid, her attainment of age 62, or the death of either party, and awarded her only 10% of the value of the plaintiff's business interests.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff maintenance in the sum of $500 per week, nontaxable to her, from April 24, 2008, and continuing until the earliest of her remarriage, whether valid or invalid, her attainment of age 62, or the death of either party, and substituting therefor a provision awarding her maintenance in the sum of $500 per week, nontaxable to her, from April 24, 2008, and continuing until the

900 N.Y.S.2d 372
earliest of her remarriage, whether valid or invalid, her attainment of age 66, or the death of either party; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant.

"[T]he amount and duration of maintenance is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and every case must be determined on its own unique facts"

73 A.D.3d 689
( Wortman v. Wortman, 11 A.D.3d 604, 606, 783 N.Y.S.2d 631; see Grumet v. Grumet, 37 A.D.3d 534, 535, 829 N.Y.S.2d 682). The Supreme Court must consider the factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(6)(a), which include the pre-divorce standard of living of the parties, the income and property of the parties, the equitable distribution of marital property, the duration of the marriage, the present and future...

To continue reading

Request your trial
46 cases
  • Hymowitz v. Hymowitz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 16, 2014
    ...eligibility for full Social Security benefits at the age of 66, her remarriage, or the death of either party ( see Giokas v. Giokas, 73 A.D.3d 688, 689, 900 N.Y.S.2d 370; Hamroff v. Hamroff, 35 A.D.3d 365, 366, 826 N.Y.S.2d 389; Penna v. Penna, 29 A.D.3d 970, 972, 817 N.Y.S.2d 313). Further......
  • P.D. v. L.D.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 9, 2010
    ...249 A.D.2d 444, 445, 671 N.Y.S.2d 512 [2d Dept 1998][25% award to plaintiff of defendant's law practice]; Giokas v. Giokas, 73 A.D.3d 688, 900 N.Y.S.2d 370 [2d Dept 2010][10% award to wife of husband's business]; Kerrigan v. Kerrigan, 71 A.D.3d 737, 896 N.Y.S.2d 443 [2d Dept 2010][35% award......
  • E.G. v. D.G.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 7, 2014
    ...of the defendant's business interests in real estate holding companies based on her indirect contributions); Giokas v. Giokas, 73 A.D.3d 688, 900 N.Y.S.2d 370 (2nd Dept.2010) (wife who made no direct contributions was awarded 10% of husband's businesses that was marital; husband's involveme......
  • S.H. v. E.S.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 24, 2014
    ...main purpose of a maintenance award is to give the nonmonied spouse economic independence (citation omitted)." Giokas v. Giokas, 73 A.D.3d 688, 900 N.Y.S.2d 370 (2nd Dept.2010).At the time of commencement of this action, DRL § 236 B(6)(a) required the Court to consider the following factors......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT