Girley v. State, 90-KA-0578

Citation602 So.2d 844
Decision Date24 June 1992
Docket NumberNo. 90-KA-0578,90-KA-0578
PartiesEugene GIRLEY, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi

David G. Hill, Craig Hill White & Minyard, Oxford, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Ellen Y. Dale, Sp Ass't Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON and McRAE, JJ.

McRAE, Justice, for the Court:

Eugene Girley, Jr. appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine (Count I) and for possession of more than one ounce of marijuana with intent to sell, transfer, or deliver (Count II) from the Circuit Court of Tippah County, Mississippi. Girley was sentenced to serve a term of three (3) years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections on Count I and to serve twelve (12) years in custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections on Count II, with four (4) years suspended, said sentences to run concurrently.

Finding no error in Girley's conviction for cocaine possession, we affirm the lower court's judgment and sentence under the first count. We hold, however, that the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain Girley's conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to sell. Accordingly, we reverse Girley's conviction under the second count.

I.

Officers Don Surver and Eugenia Graves of the Ripley Police Department testified that at approximately 10:00 p.m. on March 14, 1989, they observed Girley's pickup truck driving on the wrong side of the road. Surver turned on the police cruiser's overhead lights when Girley approached a four-way stop, but Girley ignored the signal and proceeded through the intersection without stopping. The officers began to pursue Girley. At one point, the officers observed Girley throw a brown paper sack out the window of his truck. The officers stopped to retrieve the sack and then continued the chase. Inside the brown paper sack was a clear plastic bag containing a white powdery substance and a white plastic shopping bag containing four sandwich bags filled with a green leafy substance.

Eventually, Girley stopped. The officers cited him for traffic violations and arrested him on drug charges. No drugs were found either on Girley's person or in his truck, but a "pat-down" search revealed $861.69 in cash. The currency included six one-hundred dollar bills, eight twenty-dollar bills, six ten-dollar bills, six five dollar bills, eleven one-dollar bills, and assorted change.

The Batesville Crime Lab identified the white powdery substance as cocaine and the green leafy substance as 11.5 ounces of marijuana.

On October 5, 1989, the Tippah County Grand Jury indicted Girley on one count of possession of cocaine and one count of possession of more than one ounce of marijuana with intent to sell, transfer, or deliver. On February 12 and 13, 1990, the case was tried before a jury, which found Girley guilty on both counts. On February 23, 1990, the trial court sentenced him to three years imprisonment on the first count and to twelve years imprisonment on the second count with four years suspended. The sentences were to run consecutively. On April 5, 1990, Girley filed an Motion for JNOV/New Trial, which the court denied.

II.

On appeal, Girley has raised several assignments of error, but only one has merit:

THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN OVERRULING GIRLEY'S MOTION FOR JNOV/NEW TRIAL BECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO INTRODUCE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA WITH AN INTENT TO SELL.

When seeking to prove intent to sell, transfer or deliver, the State must establish more than a mere suspicion of intent. See McCray v. State, 486 So.2d 1247, 1251 (Miss.1986). On numerous occasions, we have reversed convictions where the evidence strongly suggested an intent to sell, but failed to prove such intent beyond reasonable doubt. See, e.g., McCray, 486 So.2d at 1251-52 (evidence insufficient to prove intent to sell where defendant traveled by plane to source city accompanied by others who used fictitious names, remained in city for short time, checked luggage with marijuana residue, and carried $6,000 in cash); Bryant v. State, 427 So.2d 131, 132 (Miss.1983) (possession of 55 methaqualone tablets and 85 1/2 diazepam tablets insufficient to prove intent to sell); Hollingsworth v. State, 392 So.2d 515, 517-18 (Miss.1981) (possession of several sandwich bags of marijuana, set of scales, and box of sandwich bags insufficient). We find that Girley's conviction on the intent-to-sell charge falls into this line of cases.

In cases where we have affirmed convictions based on similar charges, the evidence greatly exceeded what we see in the record now before us. See, e.g., Coyne v. State, 484 So.2d 1018, 1022 (Miss.1986) (sufficient evidence of intent to sell where defendant was in possession of scales, more than five pounds of marijuana, part of it found loose in large plastic bag and in aluminum pan); Breckenridge v. State, 472 So.2d 373, 378 (Miss.1985) (evidence was sufficient to convict where defendant possessed 14 varieties of drugs, $9,734 in cash, address book, receipt book which referred to large money transactions, plastic bags containing marijuana, and scales).

III.

We hold that possession of eleven and a half ounces of marijuana contained in four sandwich bags along with $861.69 in assorted denominations, without more, is insufficient evidence to sustain Girley's conviction for possessing marijuana with intent to sell. The trial court should have granted judgment of acquittal notwithstanding the verdict on the marijuana count. Regarding the conviction for possession of cocaine, we find no error.

CONVICTION FOR POSSESSION OF COCAINE (COUNT I) AND SENTENCE OF THREE (3) YEARS...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Henderson v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • May 27, 2021
    ...with the intent to distribute must be reversed and rendered. Id. ; Hicks v. State , 580 So. 2d 1302 (Miss. 1991) ; Girley v. State , 602 So. 2d 844 (Miss. 1992).¶54. The jury in this case was instructed on the lesser-included offense of simple possession of methamphetamine.9 Because the evi......
  • Fox v. State, No. 1999-KA-00186-SCT.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • February 24, 2000
    ...Here, Fox says that over eight ounces of marijuana is not enough to show possession with intent to distribute. Fox cites to Girley v. State, 602 So.2d 844 (Miss.1992) for support. Fox, citing no authority, also insists that possessing a pager alone is not evidence of intent to distribute dr......
  • Holland v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • June 8, 1995
    ...of cash nor the electronic pager is sufficient to establish an intent to distribute beyond a reasonable doubt. See Girley v. State, 602 So.2d 844, 845 (Miss.1992) (concluding that eleven and half ounces of marijuana contained in four sandwich bags along with $861.69 in cash was insufficient......
  • Henderson v. State, 2019-KA-01414-SCT
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • May 27, 2021
    ...with the intent to distribute must be reversed and rendered. Id.; Hicks v. State, 580 So. 2d 1302 (Miss. 1991); Girley v. State, 602 So. 2d 844 (Miss. 1992).¶54. The jury in this case was instructed on the lesser-included offense of simple possession of methamphetamine.9 Because the evidenc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT