Githens v. Githens, 30029
| Decision Date | 01 July 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 30029,30029 |
| Citation | 234 Ga. 715,217 S.E.2d 291 |
| Parties | Darlene Alice GITHENS v. James Henry GITHENS et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Carman v. Lavender, Atlanta, for appellant.
Jack Tillery Elrod, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
This action was brought by the mother of two children to obtain their custody from their father. The father contends that he is entitled to retain custody of the children because of a change in conditions affecting their welfare since the rendition of the divorce. After a hearing the trial court awarded custody of the children to their father. The mother appeals to this court. Held:
1. The mother contends that she was entitled to a judgment on the pleadings since she was awarded custody of the children by the divorce decree. There is no merit in this contention since the father's pleadings showed a charge of circumstances had occurred since the divorce decree was entered.
2. The mother contends that the court erred in rendering a final judgment without making findings of fact. Code Ann. § 81A-152(a) provides: 'In all actions in superior court tried upon the facts without jury, except actions involving only uncontested divorce, alimony and custody of minors, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon . . .' Acts 1969, pp. 645, 646; 1970, pp. 170, 171. This Code section requires findings of facts and conclusions of law in contested divorce, contested alimony and contested custody of children actions. The section is mandatory. Therefore, the trial court is directed to enter the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which its decision is based. Doyal Development Company, Inc. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261, 215 S.E.2d 471.
Judgment reversed with direction.
All the Justices concur, except NICHOLS, C.J., and UNDERCOFLER, P.J., who dissent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rude v. Rude
...facts and conclusions of law as required in contested divorce, alimony and child custody cases tried without a jury. Githens v. Githens, 234 Ga. 715, 217 S.E.2d 291 (1975); Haralson v. Moore, 236 Ga. 131(3), 223 S.E.2d 107 (1976); Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a). This requirement may be waived in w......
-
Greene County v. North Shore Resort
...Ga.App. 889(1), 473 S.E.2d 563 (1996); see generally Motes v. Stanton, 237 Ga. 440, 441, 228 S.E.2d 831 (1976); Githens v. Githens, 234 Ga. 715, 716, 217 S.E.2d 291 (1975); Frasier v. Dept. of Human Resources, 159 Ga.App. 1, 282 S.E.2d 667 (1981). "The purpose of findings of fact is threefo......
-
Coleman v. Coleman, 31696
...of fact and conclusions of law in the record of contested custody actions. See Code Ann. § 81A-152 (Rev. 1972); and, Githens v. Githens, 234 Ga. 715, 217 S.E.2d 291 (1975). The reason for this requirement is to assist this court in its review of the merits of an appeal. See Motes v. Stanton......
-
Jardine v. Jardine, 30556
...law in its order. There being no enumeration of error directed to this argument, we find no reversible error. Cf. Githens v. Githens, 234 Ga. 715(2), 217 S.E.2d 291 (1975). 2. The trial court did not err in overruling the wife's motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a claim fo......