Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc.
| Decision Date | 08 March 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 21872,21872 |
| Citation | 301 S.E.2d 545,279 S.C. 12 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | John F. GIVENS, Appellant, v. STEEL STRUCTURES, INC. and The Maryland, Respondents. |
James A. Stuckey and Lawrence C. Kobrovsky, Charleston, for appellant.
Sinkler, Gibbs & Simons, Charleston, for respondents.
This appeal is from an order of the Circuit Court dismissing appellant's claim for benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act. We affirm.
In November 1976, while employed by Stark Rubber Company, Inc., appellant sustained an injury to his lower back. He was awarded workmen's compensation benefits in a substantial amount for this injury and the resulting permanent partial disability. In January 1978, less than one month after final settlement of this claim, the appellant applied for and received employment from the respondent, Steel Structures. On his job application he knowingly and wilfully made false representation that he had no physical defects or prior injuries. Furthermore, the respondent relied upon this false representation in hiring appellant. These facts are not disputed.
In June 1978, appellant received an injury to his back while working for Steel Structures and subsequently filed a claim for benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The single hearing commissioner dismissed the claim. On appeal by the claimant to the full Industrial Commission, the ruling was reversed on the basis that no causal connection existed between the first and second injuries. Subsequently on appeal by the respondent, the Circuit Court dismissed the claim.
In Chavis v. Watkins, 256 S.C. 30, 180 S.E.2d 648, we held that the relationship of employment was a jurisdictional issue for purposes of workmen's compensation benefits and that our review would be governed by the preponderance of the evidence. Subsequently, we ruled in Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co., 260 S.C. 463, 196 S.E.2d 833, that the relationship would be vitiated where false statements were made on a job application in the presence of three factors: (1) knowing and wilful nature of the false representation as to physical condition; (2) reliance by the employer upon the false representation as a substantial factor in the hiring; (3) causal connection between the false representation and the injury. This appeal turns upon the third and final element.
We are satisfied that the record in this case amply sustains the finding of a causal connection between the two...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gray v. Club Group, Ltd.
... ... Lark v. Bi-Lo Inc., 276 S.C. 130, 276 S.E.2d 304 (1981) ... The appellate court has the power ... 546, 459 S.E.2d 302 (1995) ; Wilson, supra ; Vines, supra; Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc., 279 S.C. 12, 301 S.E.2d 545 (1983) ; Canady, ... ...
-
Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.
...the preponderance of the evidence." Glass v. Dow Chem. Co., 325 S.C. 198, 202, 482 S.E.2d 49, 51 (1997); see Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc., 279 S.C. 12, 301 S.E.2d 545 (1983) (finding that facts establishing the jurisdiction of the Workers' Compensation Commission are reviewed by the app......
-
Oesterreich v. Canton-Inwood Hosp.
...General Hospital, 110 N.M. 683, 798 P.2d 1069 (1990), cert. denied 110 N.M. 653, 798 P.2d 1039 (1990); Givens v. Steel Structures Inc., 279 S.C. 12, 301 S.E.2d 545 (1983); U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Edwards, 764 S.W.2d 533 (Tenn.1989); Anderson v. Chattanooga General Services Co., 631 S.W......
-
Sanchez v. Memorial General Hosp.
...there was a causal connection between claimant's false representation and his work-related injury. See id.; Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc., 279 S.C. 12, 301 S.E.2d 545 (1983) (record sustained finding of causal connection between two injuries where claimant testified that same part of bac......