Glacier Nw., Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters Local Union No. 174

Decision Date16 November 2020
Docket NumberNo. 79520-1-I,79520-1-I
Citation475 P.3d 1025
CourtWashington Court of Appeals
Parties GLACIER NORTHWEST, INC. d/b/a CalPortland, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 174, Respondent.

PUBLISHED OPINION

Andrus, A.C.J.

¶ 1 Glacier Northwest Inc., who employs drivers represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174 (Union), filed this lawsuit against the Union for intentional destruction of property, misrepresentation, and tortious interference with a business relationship, relating to the Union's conduct during and immediately after an August 2017 strike. The trial court initially dismissed Glacier's property destruction claims, concluding they were federally preempted. It subsequently dismissed the misrepresentation and tortious interference claims on summary judgment, concluding Glacier failed to present a genuine issue of material fact on the elements of justifiable reliance or proximate cause.

¶ 2 We reverse the dismissal of Glacier's claims for intentional destruction of property because those claims are based on conduct neither actually nor arguably protected under section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.1 We affirm the dismissal of Glacier's remaining claims.

FACTS

¶ 3 Glacier sells and delivers ready-mix concrete throughout Washington State.2 Its 80 or 90 truck drivers, who work out of Glacier's facilities in Seattle along the Duwamish River, and in Kenmore and Snoqualmie, are represented exclusively by the Union. Glacier's lawsuit was based on two instances of alleged Union misconduct at the beginning of a strike on August 11, 2017, and on the day the strike ended on August 18, 2017.

August 11 Work Stoppage

¶ 4 Glacier alleged that in the early morning hours of August 11, 2017, Glacier and its drivers began the process of batching and delivering concrete to Glacier customers. "Batching" is the process of preparing concrete for the immediate delivery to a customer, and generally requires measuring and mixing different ingredients (cement, sand, aggregate, admixture, and water) pursuant to a customer's specifications. Glacier places these raw materials into a hopper and blends them together. Once it is batched, Glacier discharges the concrete into a ready-mix truck for immediate delivery to a customer's project site. The trucks are specifically designed to maintain the integrity of the batched concrete in a revolving drum during transport.

¶ 5 Glacier further alleged that concrete is a perishable product because once at rest, it begins to harden immediately and can begin to set within 20 to 30 minutes. Once the raw materials are batched, the concrete cannot be saved for another day and must be delivered, poured, and finished. As a result, Glacier's drivers have a limited amount of time in which to deliver and pump the concrete or it becomes useless. If the drivers do not deliver the concrete within this short time period, the concrete is rendered unusable because the concrete's physical condition materially changes, and it eventually hardens. And if the batched concrete remains in the revolving drum of the ready-mix truck beyond its useful life span, the concrete will harden inside the revolving drum and cause significant damage to the truck. Once concrete starts to set, it begins to thicken, placing pressure on the hydraulic system of the rotating barrel of the truck. If a driver stops the rotation of the drum, the setting process commences and the concrete starts to harden inside. Glacier alleged the Union representatives and Glacier's drivers all knew of this perishable nature of batched concrete.

¶ 6 Glacier alleged that shortly before 7:00 a.m., on the morning of August 11, 2017, Union agents were physically present at Glacier's Seattle facility and observed drivers loading batched concrete onto its trucks. Glacier's collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the Union had expired as of July 31, 2017, and the Union was in the process of negotiating a replacement CBA with Glacier and other concrete companies. Glacier further alleged that once the Union representatives knew there was a substantial volume of batched concrete in Glacier's barrels, hoppers, and ready-mix trucks, they called for a work stoppage. Glacier alleged that the Union intentionally timed this cessation of work to ensure the destruction of all of the batched concrete.

¶ 7 According to Adam Doyle, Glacier's dispatch coordinator, at the time the Union called the strike, Glacier had mixer trucks already on job sites delivering concrete, drivers on the road with fully loaded trucks, drivers in the yard waiting to have their trucks loaded from Glacier barrels and hoppers, and drivers in the yard with fully loaded trucks ready to depart. Doyle notified the drivers that they were obligated to finish any job that Glacier had started. Normally, when drivers return to the yard after delivering concrete, they offload any leftover concrete into a "reclaimer" or into a form to make ecology blocks. They then rinse out the drum and return to the line to take on another load.

¶ 8 But on August 11, the drivers all brought their mixer trucks back to the yard between 7:00 a.m. and 7:45 a.m. Justin Denison, Glacier's ready-mix concrete manager, testified that some of the drivers, who were on their way to jobsites with trucks loaded with 9 to 10 cubic yards of concrete when the Union called the strike, returned their trucks to Glacier's Duwamish facility without delivering the concrete. He testified that at least 16 drivers came back with fully loaded trucks, and 9 drivers abandoned them in Glacier's yard without notice to Glacier. Seven drivers parked their trucks, notified Glacier of their return, and sought instructions for dealing with the concrete. Denison described the scene:

I was present in the yard when the loaded trucks came rolling back in on August 11.... It was complete chaos. We had to offload the concrete from the barrels before it "set up." We had to dispose of the concrete in a timely manner to avoid costly damage to the mixer trucks and in a manner so as not to create an environmental disaster. We had to reorganize material storage bunkers into which we offloaded the concrete. We had to deal with settling ponds, treatment of material and filter presses to handle hundreds of cubic yards of concrete. It took us 5 hours to properly handle and clean-up the mess created by the drivers.

Glacier contended it took emergency measures to offload the hardening concrete into hastily constructed bunkers in an environmentally safe manner, and quickly washed out the trucks to prevent damage to them. But it was unable to save any of the concrete. Glacier had to subsequently bring in excavation equipment and trucks to break up the fully hardened concrete and haul it to a disposal site.

¶ 9 Glacier initially issued disciplinary letters to the 16 drivers who returned their loaded trucks to Glacier's facility for abandoning the trucks and violating Glacier's work rules and safety rules by deliberately putting Glacier's business in imminent harm. When Glacier's management learned that 7 of the drivers had given Glacier advance notice of the strike and their intent to return loaded trucks to Glacier's facility, Glacier withdrew the warning letters to these drivers.

August 19 Mat Pour

¶ 10 GLY Construction, a general contractor, had subcontracted with Glacier to supply concrete for a commercial project in the South Lake Union neighborhood of Seattle (the Vulcan Project). When the Union called the August 11 strike, GLY had a large mat pour,3 as part of the Vulcan Project, scheduled for Saturday, August 12, 2017. Glacier canceled this job due to the strike.

¶ 11 In the early morning hours of August 18, 2017, the Union and Glacier agreed to a successor CBA covering August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2021. Around 11 a.m. that morning, the Union called a meeting with the drivers, during which they voted to approve the CBA (August 2017 CBA).4 Immediately after the August 18 ratification vote, the Union drafted a press release announcing the vote, and posted it on the Union's website and Facebook page within a couple hours of the meeting. This release said that the Glacier strike was over and "everyone is now back to work."

¶ 12 That same day, GLY Construction employee Dane Buechler called Ted Herb, the president of the company, to inform him that the Union had ratified a new CBA with Glacier. Buechler wanted to proceed with the Vulcan Project mat pour after midnight that night but was unsure if the Glacier drivers would respond to work that night. Glacier managers had heard rumors that the drivers had been instructed not to answer phones for Saturday work. Glacier's vice president and general manager, Melanie O'Regan, was unwilling to mobilize for the mat pour without reason to believe the drivers would show up because Glacier would then be responsible for both Glacier's losses and GLY's mobilization costs and potentially liquidated damages.

¶ 13 Buechler asked Herb to call the Union's agent, Rick Hicks, with whom Herb had previously discussed the complexities of this concrete job, to find out if the rumors were true. Greg Mettler, Glacier's ready-mix sales manager, also spoke to Herb that afternoon and learned Herb intended to call Hicks to discuss the concerns about whether drivers would show up for the mat pour.

¶ 14 Herb called Hicks around 12:35 p.m. that afternoon, and Hicks confirmed the Union had approved the successor CBA. Herb told Hicks that GLY wanted to reschedule the Vulcan Project mat pour for shortly after midnight that night, on ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Glacier Nw., Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters Local Union No. 174
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 16, 2021
    ...of property claims but affirmed the dismissal of the misrepresentation claims. Glacier Nw., Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters Local Union No. 174 , 15 Wash. App. 2d 393, 475 P.3d 1025 (2020). The Court of Appeals recognized the applicable preemption standard from the leading case, San Diego B......
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Found. v. Pierce
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 2020
    ... ... Honeywell, Inc. , 77 Wash. App. 294, 298, 890 P.2d 480 (1995) ... wages owed from their employers." Int'l Union of Police Ass'n, Local 748 v. Kitsap County , 183 ... ...
  • King Cnty. Pub. Hosp. v. Wash. State Nurses Ass'n
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • October 17, 2022
    ...174 to argue, "a union must refrain from inciting, encouraging, or misleading its members into violating" a CBA.[9] 15 Wn.App. 2d 393, 475 P.3d 1025 (2020). Glacier Northwest analyzed claims of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, and tortious interference, neither of which are alleg......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT