Glass v. Bailey
| Decision Date | 22 April 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 29098,29098 |
| Citation | 233 Ind. 266,118 N.E.2d 800 |
| Parties | GLASS v. BAILEY et al. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Warren W. Martin, Jr., Jeffersonville, for appellant.
Robert G. Bottorff, Jeffersonville, for appellees.
The appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus to obtain the custody of her infant son, Ronald Lee Meadows. Judgment went for the appellees. The appellant's motion for new trial, which asserts (1) that the decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence and (2) that it is contrary to law, was overruled, and she appeals.
Although the first specification in appellant's motion for new trial presents no question, since a negative decision may not be attacked upon the ground that there is a lack of evidence to sustain it, the appellant may properly assert under the second that by the decision she was denied relief to which she was entitled under the evidence as construed most favorably to the appellees. Wilson v. Rollings, 1938, 214 Ind. 155, 14 N.E.2d 905; McKee v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York, 1943, 222 Ind. 10, 51 N.E.2d 474; Department of Insurance v. Indiana Travelers Assur. Co., 1945, 115 Ind.App. 285, 58 N.E.2d 761; Wadler v. Mogul Rubber Corporation, 1945, 116 Ind.App. 152, 61 N.E.2d 472; Pearson Co. v. Cohen, 1949, 118 Ind.App. 699, 83 N.E.2d 433.
It appears that the child was born in July, 1947, while the appellant was a patient in a tuberculosis hospital. She was unable to care for him and her sisters and mother refused to take him. The appellant asked the appellee, Ethel Bailey, to take the child as her own. He was turned over to Mrs. Bailey when he was five days old and Mr. and Mrs. Bailey, the appellees, have ever since properly cared for and supported him without contribution from any source.
The appellant was released from the tuberculosis hospital in 1947. She has an arrested case of tuberculosis. She made no serious effort to retake the child until just before she filed her petition in this case. She is now remarried and able to furnish a home for the child.
In cases of this kind the natural rights of the parent are entitled to due consideration, but the welfare and happiness of the child is the paramount consideration. Hard and fast rules of law do not prevail. The question presented rests upon the exercise of a sound judicial discretion by the trial judge. It is seldom, indeed, that this court will reverse the decision of a trial judge who has seen the child, and has seen and heard the witnesses and observed their appearance and demeanor, all of which facilities for reaching a just and safe conclusion are denied to us. The above principles are so firmly established that the citation of authorities would be superfluous.
We quote Brown v. Beachler, 1946...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Halstead v. Halstead
...Altmiller v. Forsman, 76 Idaho 521, 285 P.2d 1064; Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613; Glass v. Bailey, 233 Ind. 266, 118 N.E.2d 800; State ex rel. Paul v. Peniston, 235 La. 579, 105 So.2d 228; Thumma v. Hartsook, 239 Md. 38, 210 A.2d 151; In re Adoption o......
-
Guardianship of Williams, Matter of
...116 Idaho 297, 775 P.2d 611 (1989); In re custody of Peterson, 112 Ill.2d 48, 96 Ill.Dec. 690, 491 N.E.2d 1150 (1986); Glass v. Bailey, 233 Ind. 266, 118 N.E.2d 800 (1954); Davis v. Collinsworth, 771 S.W.2d 329 (Ky.1989); Pastore v. Sharp, 81 Md.App. 314, 567 A.2d 509 (1989), cert. denied, ......
-
Watson v. Department of Public Welfare of Harrison County
...the court was unwarranted in finding that the child lacked proper parental care and guardianship. The case of Glass v. Bailey, et al., 1953, 233 Ind. 266, 118 N.E.2d 800, 801, well states the factors involved in matters concerning the custody of 'In cases of this kind the natural rights of ......
-
In re Guardianship of BH
...for the natural parents emphasized in Gilmore, other cases appear to have given this factor diminished weight. In Glass v. Bailey, 233 Ind. 266, 118 N.E.2d 800 (1954), we affirmed a judgment adverse to the natural mother, observing that "the natural rights of the parent are entitled to due ......